Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36824060›Full record

ArticleJournal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty2023

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Patients with Massive Rotator Cuff Tears or Cuff Tear Arthropathies at a Minimum Follow-up of 7 Years.

Hugues De La Selle, Tristan Lascar, Pascal Clappaz, Edouard Decrette, Floris van Rooij, Mo Saffarini, Laurent Obert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Safety and Efficacy of Subscapularis-Sparing Shoulder Arthroplasty Approaches: A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Hugues De La SelleOrthopaedics Department, Hôpital privé Sainte-Marie - Ramsay Santé, Chalon-sur-Saône, France.
Tristan LascarOrthopaedics Department, Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace, Monte Carlo, Monaco.
Pascal ClappazOrthopaedics Department, Pôle Chirurgie Orthopédique, Bourg-en-Bresse, France.
Edouard DecretteOrthopaedics Department, Centre Épaule Hôpital Privé d'Antony, Antony, France.
Floris van RooijReSurg SA, Nyon, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3513-0599
Mo SaffariniReSurg SA, Nyon, Switzerland.
Laurent ObertOrthopaedics Department, Hôpital Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France.
Federal Roads Office · CHClinique Les Fontaines · FRGénérale de Santé · FRHôpital Privé Jean Mermo · FRPrincess Grace Hospital Centre · MC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate indications and factors that influence long-term clinical outcomes and revision rates for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in shoulders with irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (mRCTs) or cuff tear arthropathies (CTAs). Methods: The authors retrospectively evaluated a consecutive series of shoulders with no fracture sequelae that underwent primary RSA between 2011 and 2013. Independent observers collected demographic data, surgical techniques, and implant types, as well as primary outcome measures such as American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) score and Constant score (CS). Study design: Case series, level IV. Results: From the initial series of 123 patients that underwent RSA, 29 patients died (24%) for reasons unrelated to the shoulder arthroplasty, 11 were lost to follow-up (9%), and 4 required revision surgery (3%). The final cohort of 79 patients comprised 55 women (70%), and 24 men (30%), aged 72.7 ± 7.0. At a final follow-up of 8.9 ± 0.6 years (range: 7.4-10.3) the absolute CS was 59.0 ± 16.2, the age-/sex-adjusted CS was 76.6 ± 41.2, and ASES was 77.1 ± 20.3. Univariable analysis revealed no associations for absolute CS, but revealed that age-/sex-adjusted CS was significantly lower for patients with high blood pressure (β = -15.8, p = .025). Conclusions: At a minimum follow-up of 7.4 years, the absolute CS was 59.0 ± 16.2, the age-/sex-adjusted CS was 87.4 ± 24.1 and ASES was 77.1 ± 20.3. When stratifying the outcomes of RSA by indication, there were no significant differences in patients with mRCTs versus CTA in terms of absolute CS, age-/sex-adjusted CS, and ASES. Univariable analysis revealed no association with absolute and age-/sex-adjusted CS for type of indication or surgical approach.

Indexed as

cuff tear arthropathylong termmassive rotator cuff tearsreverse shoulder arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID36824060
PMCPMC9941602
OpenAlexW4321379899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.