Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36823591›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Health Literacy Scale Short-Form in the Chinese population.

Xiaonan Sun, Ke Lv, Fei Wang, Pu Ge, Yuyao Niu, Wenli Yu, Xinying Sun, Wai-Kit Ming, Miao He, Yibo Wu

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Changes in health-related quality of life and inequality in China: evidence from a nationwide repeated cross-sectional survey (2021-2023).Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiaonan SunDepartment of Social Science and Humanities, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Ke LvSchool of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Fei WangState Key Laboratory of Cognition and Learning, Department of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Pu GeInstitute of Chinese Medical Sciences-State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, University of Macau, Macau, China.
Yuyao NiuFaculty of Arts and Humanities, University of Macau, Macau, China.
Wenli YuWeifang University of Science and Technology, Shouguang, Shandong Province, China.
Xinying SunSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Wai-Kit MingDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.
Miao HeDepartment of Social Science and Humanities, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China. hemiao767@163.com.
Yibo WuSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China. bjmuwuyibo@outlook.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9607-313X

Funding

2021 Heilongjiang Provincial Philosophy and Social Science Research and Planning Project 21SHB106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth literacy is closely related to health status. Measuring public health literacy levels helps to warn of health status and manage health problems through timely interventions. The items of relevant evaluation tools are complex and numerous in China, and there is no recognized health literacy brief scale for the whole population. To translate the 12-item short-form health literacy scale (HLS-SF12) and test the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the HLS-SF12 in the Chinese population.

methodsThe HLS-SF12 was translated into Chinese using the procedures of translation, back translation, and cultural debugging. 10,951 residents were selected by quota sampling method to test the validity and reliability of the scale, and 33 people were selected to retest after 2 weeks. The reliability was tested by using internal consistency coefficient and test-retest reliability. The validity was tested by using confirmatory factor analysis, content validity, convergent validity and discriminant validity.

resultsThe Cronbach's Alpha coefficient for the total scale was 0.94, and the test-retest reliability was 0.89. The Cronbach's Alpha coefficients for the three subscales of health care, disease prevention, and health promotion respectively were 0.86, 0.86, 0.87, and the test-retest reliability respectively were 0.91, 0.79, 0.63. The confirmatory factor analysis identified a three factors model and showed nice goodness of fit indices for Chinese HLS-SF12 (GFI = 0.96, CFI = 0.97, IFI = 0.97, TLI = 0.96, and RMSEA = 0.07).

conclusionThe Chinese version of the HLS-SF12 has good reliability and validity, and can be used as a tool to evaluate the health literacy of Chinese people.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyAsian PeopleChinaHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesChinese populationHealth literacyReliabilityValidation

Identifiers

PMID36823591
PMCPMC9951431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.