Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36823564›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2023

An age-old problem or an old-age problem? A UK survey of attitudes, historical use and recommendations by healthcare professionals to use healthcare apps.

Sulayman Z Chowdhury, Sebastian Stevens, Charlotte Wu, Claire Woodward, Tim Andrews, Liz Ashall-Payne, Simon Leigh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Development of the Digital Inclusion Questionnaire (DIQUEST) in Parkinson's Disease.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sulayman Z ChowdhuryThe Organisation for the Review of Care and Health Applications (ORCHA), Sci-Tech Daresbury, Vanguard House, Keckwick Lane, Daresbury, WA4 4AB, UK.
Sebastian StevensThe Organisation for the Review of Care and Health Applications (ORCHA), Sci-Tech Daresbury, Vanguard House, Keckwick Lane, Daresbury, WA4 4AB, UK.
Charlotte WuThe Organisation for the Review of Care and Health Applications (ORCHA), Sci-Tech Daresbury, Vanguard House, Keckwick Lane, Daresbury, WA4 4AB, UK.
Claire WoodwardThe Organisation for the Review of Care and Health Applications (ORCHA), Sci-Tech Daresbury, Vanguard House, Keckwick Lane, Daresbury, WA4 4AB, UK.
Tim AndrewsThe Organisation for the Review of Care and Health Applications (ORCHA), Sci-Tech Daresbury, Vanguard House, Keckwick Lane, Daresbury, WA4 4AB, UK.
Liz Ashall-PayneThe Organisation for the Review of Care and Health Applications (ORCHA), Sci-Tech Daresbury, Vanguard House, Keckwick Lane, Daresbury, WA4 4AB, UK.
Simon LeighThe Organisation for the Review of Care and Health Applications (ORCHA), Sci-Tech Daresbury, Vanguard House, Keckwick Lane, Daresbury, WA4 4AB, UK. Simon.leigh@orcha.co.uk.
Sci-Tech Daresbury · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe coronavirus pandemic has exacerbated barriers to accessing face-to-face care. Consequently, the potential for digital health technologies (DHTs) to address unmet needs has gained traction. DHTs may circumvent several barriers to healthy independent living, resulting in both socioeconomic and clinical benefits. However, previous studies have demonstrated these benefits may be disproportionately realised among younger populations while excluding older people.

methodsWe performed a prospective survey using the One Poll market research platform among 2000 adults from the United Kingdom. To mitigate against self-selection bias, participants were not informed of the topic of the survey until they had completed recruitment. We compared willingness to use and historical use of health-apps, in addition to recommendations to use health-apps from healthcare professionals; comparing outcomes across all age groups, including a reference group (n = 222) of those aged 18-24. Outcomes were analysed using multivariate logistic regression and reported as odds ratios (OR) with respondent age, ethnicity, gender, and location as covariates.

resultsWillingness to use health-apps decreased significantly with age, reaching a minimum (OR = 0.39) among those aged 65 and over compared to the reference group of 18-24 year olds. Despite this, more than 52% of those aged 65 and over were willing to use health-apps. Functions and features most cited as useful by older populations included symptom self-monitoring and surgery recovery assistance. The likelihood of never having used a health-app also increased consistently with age, reaching a maximum among those aged 65 and over (OR = 18.3). Finally, the likelihood of being recommended health-apps by a healthcare professional decreased significantly with age, (OR = 0.09) for those aged 65 and over. In absolute terms, 33.8% of those aged 18-24, and 3.9% of those aged 65 and over were recommended health-apps by their healthcare professionals.

conclusionAlthough absolute utilisation of health-apps decreases with age, the findings of this study suggest that the gap between those willing to use health-apps, and those being recommended health-apps by healthcare professionals increases with age. Given the increasing availability of evidence-based health-apps designed for older populations, this may result in entirely avoidable unmet needs, suggesting that more should be done by healthcare professionals to recommend health-apps to older persons who are generally positive about their use. This may result in considerable improvements in healthy and independent ageing.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsTelemedicineAgedAged, 80 and overDelivery of Health CareHumansProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomAgeingDigital healthEqualityEquityGeriatricHealthcare appsmHealthOld-ageSmartphone applications

Identifiers

PMID36823564
PMCPMC9950003
OpenAlexW4321604708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.