Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36823563›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

Enhancing medical students` confidence and performance in integrated structured clinical examinations (ISCE) through a novel near-peer, mixed model approach during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Ravanth Baskaran, Srinjay Mukhopadhyay, Sashiananthan Ganesananthan, Movin Peramuna Gamage, Nishaanth Dalavaye, Vincent Ng, Richard Bennett, Sripradha Srinivasan, Parvathy Sureshkumarnair, Robert Spencer and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Assessing the Impact of an Online Surgical Oncology Teaching Series on Learner Confidence on a Global Scale.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ravanth BaskaranSchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park Campus, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
Srinjay MukhopadhyaySchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park Campus, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
Sashiananthan GanesananthanChelsea and Westminister Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 369 Fulham Rd, London, SW10 9NH, UK.
Movin Peramuna GamageSchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park Campus, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
Nishaanth DalavayeSchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park Campus, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
Vincent NgSchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park Campus, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
Richard BennettSchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park Campus, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
Sripradha SrinivasanSchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park Campus, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
Parvathy SureshkumarnairSchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park Campus, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
Robert SpencerNeuroscience and Mental Health Research Institute (NMHRI), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Harsh BhattNeuroscience and Mental Health Research Institute (NMHRI), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Susruta ManivannanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Malik ZabenSchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park Campus, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK. Zabenm@cardiff.ac.uk.
Cardiff University · GBChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBSouthampton General Hospital · GBUniversity Hospital of Wales · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNear-peer medical education serves as an important method of delivering education to junior students by senior students. Due to the reduced clinical exposure because of the COVID-19 pandemic, we developed a mentorship scheme to help medical students with their Integrated Structured Clinical Examinations (ISCEs) by providing a combination of near-peer mentorship together with lecture-based teaching on a weekly basis for a 12-week period. Students attended a specialty-focused lecture every Tuesday followed by a small group teaching session organised by their tutor.

methodsA longitudinal evaluative interventional study was undertaken by the international student led medical education organisation, OSCEazy. The teaching programme was organised and conducted by third year medical students to a recruited cohort of second year medical students. Students' perceptions of ISCEs (confidence, anxiety, and overall performance) were evaluated using 5-point Likert scales while their knowledge of the specialty was assessed using 10 single best answer questions which were distributed via Google® forms at the start and end of each week. In addition, we assessed tutor perceptions of their teaching and learning experience.

resultsSeventy-two tutees were enrolled in the programme (mean age: 24.4, female: 77.8%). 88.9% of the participants had not attended any online ISCE teaching prior to this. They preferred in-person ISCE teaching as compared to virtual sessions [median 4.5 (IQR 4-5) vs 3 (IQR 3-4), p <  0.0001), respectively]. There was a significant overall increase in knowledge when comparing pre-session and post-session performance [mean 53.7% vs 70.7%, p <  0.0001)]. There was a significant increase in student confidence [Confidence: median 3 (IQR:3-4) vs 4 (IQR 3-4), p <  0.0001] while no change was seen in the anxiety and perception of their overall performance in an ISCE. [Anxiety: median 3 (IQR 2-4) vs 3 (IQR 3-4), p = 0.37, Performance: median 3 (IQR 3-4) vs median 3 (IQR 3-4), p <  0.0001]. The tutors reported an increase in their confidence in teaching ISCEs online [median 3 (IQR 2-3.25) vs median 4 (IQR 4-5), p <  0.0001)].

conclusionOnline near-peer teaching increases the confidence of both tutees and tutors involved while enhancing the tutees' knowledge of the specialty. Thus, medical schools should incorporate near-peer teaching in their curriculum to enhance the student learning experience.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalAdultCurriculumFemaleHumansLearningPandemicsPeer GroupTeachingYoung AdultClinical assessmentMedical educationMixed modalNear-peerNear-peer; medical education; clinical; integrated/objective structured clinical examination (ISCE/OSCE)OSCEs

Identifiers

PMID36823563
PMCPMC9947444
OpenAlexW4321600099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.