Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36823559›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

The CONFIDENT study protocol: a randomized controlled trial comparing two methods to increase long-term care worker confidence in the COVID-19 vaccines.

Gabrielle Stevens, Lisa C Johnson, Catherine H Saunders, Peter Schmidt, Ailyn Sierpe, Rachael P Thomeer, N Ruth Little, Matthew Cantrell, Renata W Yen, Jacqueline A Pogue and 11 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05168800 (CONFIDENT), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05168800 nacompletednot on this map

CONFIDENT: A Randomized Trial to Increase COVID-19 Vaccine Confidence in Long-term Care Workers

TypeinterventionalSponsorDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterRan2022 to 2023Enrolled2,634ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsDialogue-Based Webinar, Social Media Website, Enhanced Usual Practice
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Gabrielle StevensThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, US. gabrielle.stevens@dartmouth.edu.
Lisa C JohnsonThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, US.
Catherine H SaundersThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, US.
Peter SchmidtDepartment of Neurology, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, US.
Ailyn SierpeThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, US.
Rachael P ThomeerThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, US.
N Ruth LittleDepartment of Public Health, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, US.
Matthew CantrellNational Association of Health Care Assistants, Carl Junction, MO, US.
Renata W YenThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, US.
Jacqueline A PogueThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, US.
Timothy HolahanDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, US.
Danielle C SchubbeThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, US.
Rachel C ForcinoThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, US.
Branden FillbrookLong-term care worker partner, Romeo, MI, US.
Rowena SheppardLong-term care worker partner, Maynardville, TN, US.
Celeste WootenLong-term care worker partner, Virginia Beach, VA, US.
Don GoldmannInstitute for Healthcare Improvement, Boston, MA, US.
A James O'MalleyThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, US.
Eve DubéDepartment of Anthropology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Marie-Anne DurandThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, US.
Glyn ElwynThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, US.
Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice · USDartmouth College · USPartners In Care · USEast Carolina University · USInstitute for Healthcare Improvement · USNew York University · USUniversité Laval · CAUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute COVID-2021C2-13181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical and real-world effectiveness data for the COVID-19 vaccines have shown that they are the best defense in preventing severe illness and death throughout the pandemic. However, in the US, some groups remain more hesitant than others about receiving COVID-19 vaccines. One important group is long-term care workers (LTCWs), especially because they risk infecting the vulnerable and clinically complex populations they serve. There is a lack of research about how best to increase vaccine confidence, especially in frontline LTCWs and healthcare staff. Our aims are to: (1) compare the impact of two interventions delivered online to enhanced usual practice on LTCW COVID-19 vaccine confidence and other pre-specified secondary outcomes, (2) determine if LTCWs' characteristics and other factors mediate and moderate the interventions' effect on study outcomes, and (3) explore the implementation characteristics, contexts, and processes needed to sustain a wider use of the interventions.

methodsWe will conduct a three-arm randomized controlled effectiveness-implementation hybrid (type 2) trial, with randomization at the participant level. Arm 1 is a dialogue-based webinar intervention facilitated by a LTCW and a medical expert and guided by an evidence-based COVID-19 vaccine decision tool. Arm 2 is a curated social media web application intervention featuring interactive, dynamic content about COVID-19 and relevant vaccines. Arm 3 is enhanced usual practice, which directs participants to online public health information about COVID-19 vaccines. Participants will be recruited via online posts and advertisements, email invitations, and in-person visits to care settings. Trial data will be collected at four time points using online surveys. The primary outcome is COVID-19 vaccine confidence. Secondary outcomes include vaccine uptake, vaccine and booster intent for those unvaccinated, likelihood of recommending vaccination (both initial series and booster), feeling informed about the vaccines, identification of vaccine information and misinformation, and trust in COVID-19 vaccine information provided by different people and organizations. Exploration of intervention implementation will involve interviews with study participants and other stakeholders, an in-depth process evaluation, and testing during a subsequent sustainability phase. DISCUSSION: Study findings will contribute new knowledge about how to increase COVID-19 vaccine confidence and effective informational modalities for LTCWs.

trial registrationNCT05168800 at ClinicalTrials.gov, registered December 23, 2021.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansLong-Term CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesCOVID-19COVID-19 vaccinesDialogue-basedInterventionLong-term care workersShared decision-makingSocial mediaTrial protocolVaccine confidenceVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36823559
PMCPMC9948785
OpenAlexW4321638897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.