Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36823493›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2024

Access to nutrition services and information after active cancer treatment: a mixed methods study.

Brenton J Baguley, Sarah Benna-Doyle, Shani Drake, Annie Curtis, Jane Stewart, Jenelle Loeliger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic Review of Patient Preferences and Experiences Regarding Dietetic Outpatient Care.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Adherence to Lifestyle Recommendations and Role of Information Sources in Cancer Follow-up: A Cross Sectional Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Nutritional care in metastatic RCC: patient experiences and reported unaddressed needs.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  13. Nutritional information needs and search behaviors in argentine oncology patientsRevista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Dietitians' practices and perspectives of the delivery of nutritional care to cancer survivors in the primary care setting.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  16. A qualitative descriptive study on the perspectives and experiences of multidisciplinary HCPs in providing nutritional care to older adults with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brenton J Baguley *Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, VIC, 3220, Geelong, Australia. b.baguley@deakin.edu.au.
Sarah Benna-Doyle *School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, VIC, 3125, Burwood, Australia.
Shani DrakeNutrition and Speech Pathology Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Annie CurtisInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, VIC, 3220, Geelong, Australia.
Jane StewartNutrition and Speech Pathology Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Jenelle LoeligerSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, VIC, 3125, Burwood, Australia.
Deakin University · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEvidence-based guidelines for cancer strongly support nutrition and dietetic services for people with cancer and carers in order to improve patient-centred and health service outcomes. Access to nutrition services and information after completing active cancer treatment is relatively unknown in Australia. This study aimed to determine the availability, accessibility, barriers, and preferences to nutrition services and information after cancer treatment in Australia.

methodsUtilising mixed methods, people with cancer and carers completed a cross-sectional survey, and a sub-group of participants completed a semi-structured interview. The survey evaluated the availability of nutrition services, nutrition information searched, barriers, and preferences for nutrition information. Semi-structured interviews explored participant experience with nutrition services and information.

resultsThe 149 participants (including 10 carers) were predominately male and with a diagnosis of prostate cancer (63%). Overall, 23% of participants received nutrition information from a dietitian after cancer treatment. Participants (78%) indicated that accessing a nutrition specialist is the main barrier to receiving nutrition care after treatment. Most searched nutrition information on the internet (55%) and found the information easy to understand (89%), but conflicting (52%). Thematic analysis of interviews in fourteen cancer patients revealed three key themes pertaining to (1) preferred referral and timing of nutrition services, (2) lack of confidence in publicly available nutrition information, and (3) streamlining nutrition services for greater access.

conclusionAccess to a dietitian and evidence-based information after cancer treatment is limited for people with cancer and carers in Australia, despite the high interest and need for ongoing nutrition care. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Models of care evaluating the provision of appropriate nutrition care and information provision after cancer treatment are needed to address this unmet survivorship need.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsAustraliaCaregiversCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesCancer survivorshipNutrition

Identifiers

PMID36823493
PMCPMC10866769
OpenAlexW4321605987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.