Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36823365›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2023

Comparative analysis of EpCAM high-expressing and low-expressing circulating tumour cells with regard to their clonal relationship and clinical value.

André Franken, Annika Kraemer, Alicia Sicking, Meike Watolla, Mahdi Rivandi, Liwen Yang, Jens Warfsmann, Bernhard M Polzer, Thomas W P Friedl, Franziska Meier-Stiegen and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

André FrankenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3508-5601
Annika KraemerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Alicia SickingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Meike WatollaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Mahdi RivandiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Liwen YangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Jens WarfsmannDivision "Personalized Tumor Therapy", Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Regensburg, Germany.
Bernhard M PolzerDivision "Personalized Tumor Therapy", Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Regensburg, Germany.
Thomas W P FriedlDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4773-8067
Franziska Meier-StiegenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Nikolas H StoeckleinGeneral, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Davut DayanDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Sabine RiethdorfDepartment of Tumor Biology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Volkmar MuellerDepartment of Gynecology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Klaus PantelDepartment of Tumor Biology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5736-2772
André KochDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Andreas D HartkopfDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Natalia KrawczykDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Eugen RuckhaeberleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Dieter NiederacherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Tanja FehmDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Hans NeubauerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany. hans.neubauer@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.ORCID 0000-0002-3467-4105
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DEFraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCirculating tumour cells (CTCs) are mainly enriched based on the epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM). Although it was shown that an EpCAM low-expressing CTC fraction is not captured by such approaches, knowledge about its prognostic and predictive relevance and its relation to EpCAM-positive CTCs is lacking.

methodsWe developed an immunomagnetic assay to enrich CTCs from metastatic breast cancer patients EpCAM independently using antibodies against Trop-2 and CD-49f and characterised their EpCAM expression. DNA of single EpCAM high expressing and low expressing CTCs was analyzed regarding chromosomal aberrations and predictive mutations. Additionally, we compared CTC-enrichment on the CellSearch system using this antibody mix and the EpCAM based enrichment.

resultsBoth antibodies acted synergistically in capturing CTCs. Patients with EpCAM high-expressing CTCs had a worse overall and progression-free survival. EpCAM high- and low-expressing CTCs presented similar chromosomal aberrations and mutations indicating a close evolutionary relationship. A sequential enrichment of CTCs from the EpCAM-depleted fraction yielded a population of CTCs not captured EpCAM dependently but harbouring predictive information.

conclusionsOur data indicate that EpCAM low-expressing CTCs could be used as a valuable tumour surrogate material-although they may be prognostically less relevant than EpCAM high-expressing CTCs-and have particular benefit if no CTCs are detected using EpCAM-dependent technologies.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingChromosome AberrationsFemaleHumansBiomarkers, TumorEPCAM protein, humanEpithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule

Identifiers

PMID36823365
PMCPMC10133238
OpenAlexW4321607941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.