Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36823364›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2023

Is it still worth pursuing the repurposing of metformin as a cancer therapeutic?

Simon R Lord, Adrian L Harris

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Metformin and Myo-Inositol: A Comparative Analysis.Gynecologic and obstetric investigation · 2026
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Simon R LordDepartment of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. simon.lord@oncology.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7946-5609
Adrian L HarrisDepartment of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1376-8409

Funding

VectorP30CA006516 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI FRANK S HODI · 1985 to 2026
$330.6M
Cancer Research UK 11359Cancer Research UK 18974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past 15 years, there has been great interest in the potential to repurpose the diabetes drug, metformin, as a cancer treatment. However, despite considerable efforts being made to investigate its efficacy in a number of large randomised clinical trials in different tumour types, results have been disappointing to date. This perspective article summarises how interest initially developed in the oncological potential of metformin and the diverse clinical programme of work to date including our contribution to establishing the intra-tumoral pharmacodynamic effects of metformin in the clinic. We also discuss the lessons that can be learnt from this experience and whether a further clinical investigation of metformin in cancer is warranted.

Indexed as

MetforminNeoplasmsDrug RepositioningHumansHypoglycemic AgentsHypoglycemic AgentsMetformin

Identifiers

PMID36823364
PMCPMC10006178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read4
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.