Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36823317›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2023

Double strand DNA breaks in sperm: the bad guy in the crowd.

Juan G Alvarez, Agustin García-Peiró, Alberto Barros, Luís Ferraz, Mário Sousa, Denny Sakkas

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07621991 (A Prospective Trial Assessing the Impact of Double-strand Breaks on ART Outcomes and Predicting Its Clinical Thresholds), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07621991 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Trial Assessing the Impact of Double-strand Breaks on ART Outcomes and Predicting Its Clinical Thresholds

TypeobservationalSponsorIndira IVF Hospital Pvt LtdRan2026 to 2027Enrolled484ConditionsSperm DNA Fragmentation, Sperm DNA Impact on ART OutcomesArmsLensHooke X12 Device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The Potential of Superoxide Dismutase-RichInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Juan G AlvarezCentro de Infertilidad Masculina ANDROGEN, La Coruña, Spain. jalvarez@androgen.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4851-9579
Agustin García-PeiróCentro de Infertilidad Masculina y Análisis de Barcelona (CIMAB), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5353-7384
Alberto BarrosDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8700-3698
Luís FerrazDepartment of Urology, Hospital Centre of Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Unit 1, Rua Conceição Fernandes 1079, 4434-502, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.
Mário SousaLaboratory of Cell Biology, Department of Microscopy, ICBAS-School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3009-3290
Denny SakkasBoston IVF-Eugin Group, Boston, MA, USA. dsakkas@bostonivf.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9509-6791
Universidade do Porto · PTBoston IVF · USCentro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia · PTReprogenetics · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe main objective of this opinion paper was to bring to light and enhance our understanding of the amount of double-strand DNA breaks in sperm and whether there is a threshold of no return when considering repair by the oocyte/embryo.

methodsA brief review of literature related to the theories proposed for the appearance of double-strand breaks in human spermatozoa. Further commentary regarding their detection, how oocytes or embryos may deal with them, and what are the consequences if they are not repaired. Finally, a strategy for dealing with patients who have higher levels of double-strand DNA breaks in sperm is proposed by reviewing and presenting data using testicular extracted sperm.

resultsWe propose a theory that a threshold may exist in the oocyte that allows either complete or partial DNA repair of impaired sperm. The closer that an embryo is exposed to the threshold, the more the effect on the ensuing embryo will fail to reach various milestones, including blastocyst stage, implantation, pregnancy loss, an adverse delivery outcome, or offspring health. We also present a summary of the role that testicular sperm extraction may play in improving outcomes for couples in which the male has a high double-strand DNA break level in his sperm.

conclusionsDouble-strand DNA breaks in sperm provide a greater stress on repair mechanisms and challenge the threshold of repair in oocytes. It is therefore imperative that we improve our understanding and diagnostic ability of sperm DNA, and in particular, how double-strand DNA breaks originate and how an oocyte or embryo is able to deal with them.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedSemenDNA RepairEmbryo ImplantationFemaleHumansMalePregnancySpermatozoaDNA repairDouble strand DNA breaksSperm DNATesticular sperm

Identifiers

PMID36823317
PMCPMC10224897
OpenAlexW4321749531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.