Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36823260›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2023

Visual search and childhood vision impairment: A GAMLSS-oriented multiverse analysis approach.

Paul A Constable, Lynne Loh, Mallika Prem-Senthil, Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paul A ConstableCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia. paul.constable@flinders.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3994-1700
Lynne LohCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Mallika Prem-SenthilCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Fernando Marmolejo-RamosCentre for Change and Complexity in Learning, The University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Flinders University · AUUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this report was to analyze reaction times and accuracy in children with a vision impairment performing a feature-based visual search task using a multiverse statistical approach. The search task consisted of set sizes 4, 16, and 24, consisting of distractors (circle) and a target (ellipse) that were presented randomly to school-aged individuals with or without a vision impairment. Interactions and main effects of key variables relating to reaction times and accuracy were analyzed via a novel statistical method blending GAMLSS (generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape) and distributional regression trees. Reaction times for the target-present and target-absent conditions were significantly slower in the vision impairment group with increasing set sizes (p < .001). Female participants were significantly slower than were males for set sizes 16 and 24 in the target-absent condition (p < .001), with male participants being significantly slower than females in the target-present condition (p < .001). Accuracy was only significantly worse (p = .03) for participants less than 14 years of age for the target-absent condition with set sizes 16 and 24. There was a positive association between binocular visual acuity and search time (p < .001). The application of GAMLSS with distributional regression trees to the analysis of visual search data may provide further insights into underlying factors affecting search performance in case-control studies where psychological or physical differences may influence visual search outcomes.

Indexed as

Vision DisordersVision, OcularCase-Control StudiesChildFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeVisual AcuityReaction time methodsStatistical inferenceVisual search

Identifiers

PMID36823260
PMCPMC10167137
OpenAlexW4321611836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.