Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36823249›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2023

Mechanisms of adjustments to different types of uncertainty in the reward environment across mice and monkeys.

Jae Hyung Woo, Claudia G Aguirre, Bilal A Bari, Ken-Ichiro Tsutsui, Fabian Grabenhorst, Jeremiah Y Cohen, Wolfram Schultz, Alicia Izquierdo, Alireza Soltani

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Jae Hyung WooDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Claudia G AguirreDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Bilal A BariDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Ken-Ichiro TsutsuiDepartment of Physiology, Development & Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Fabian GrabenhorstDepartment of Physiology, Development & Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jeremiah Y CohenThe Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Brain Science Institute, Kavli Neuroscience Discovery Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Wolfram SchultzDepartment of Physiology, Development & Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Alicia IzquierdoDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Alireza SoltaniDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA. alireza.soltani@dartmouth.edu.
Dartmouth College · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USJohns Hopkins University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USTohoku University · JPUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

CRCNS Research Proposal: Cortico-amygdalar substrates of adaptive learningR01DA047870 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Alicia Izquierdo, Alireza Soltani · 2018 to 2026
$4.1M
Fostering Research Mentorship & Training during Psychiatry Residency SupplementR25MH094612 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FAVA, MAURIZIO, GREENFIELD, SHELLY F. · 2011 to 2022
$2.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA047870NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH094612Wellcome Trust 204811/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 206207/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust WT 095495Wellcome Trust WT 204811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite being unpredictable and uncertain, reward environments often exhibit certain regularities, and animals navigating these environments try to detect and utilize such regularities to adapt their behavior. However, successful learning requires that animals also adjust to uncertainty associated with those regularities. Here, we analyzed choice data from two comparable dynamic foraging tasks in mice and monkeys to investigate mechanisms underlying adjustments to different types of uncertainty. In these tasks, animals selected between two choice options that delivered reward probabilistically, while baseline reward probabilities changed after a variable number (block) of trials without any cues to the animals. To measure adjustments in behavior, we applied multiple metrics based on information theory that quantify consistency in behavior, and fit choice data using reinforcement learning models. We found that in both species, learning and choice were affected by uncertainty about reward outcomes (in terms of determining the better option) and by expectation about when the environment may change. However, these effects were mediated through different mechanisms. First, more uncertainty about the better option resulted in slower learning and forgetting in mice, whereas it had no significant effect in monkeys. Second, expectation of block switches accompanied slower learning, faster forgetting, and increased stochasticity in choice in mice, whereas it only reduced learning rates in monkeys. Overall, while demonstrating the usefulness of metrics based on information theory in examining adaptive behavior, our study provides evidence for multiple types of adjustments in learning and choice behavior according to uncertainty in the reward environment.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorRewardAnimalsDecision MakingHaplorhiniLearningMiceUncertaintyFlexibilityInformation theoryRiskUncertaintyValue-based decision making

Identifiers

PMID36823249
PMCPMC10444905
OpenAlexW4321605892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.