Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36823179›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Independence and upper extremity functioning after spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional study.

Lamprini Lili, Katharina S Sunnerhagen, Tiina Rekand, Margit Alt Murphy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Voice-Controlled Dual-Site Functional Electrical Stimulation Enables Tenodesis Grasping.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2025
    Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lamprini LiliInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Clinical Neuroscience, Rehabilitation Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Per Dubbsgatan 14, 3Rd Floor, 41345, Gothenburg, Sweden. lamprini.lili@gu.se.
Katharina S SunnerhagenInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Clinical Neuroscience, Rehabilitation Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Per Dubbsgatan 14, 3Rd Floor, 41345, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Tiina RekandInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Clinical Neuroscience, Rehabilitation Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Per Dubbsgatan 14, 3Rd Floor, 41345, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Margit Alt MurphyInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Clinical Neuroscience, Rehabilitation Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Per Dubbsgatan 14, 3Rd Floor, 41345, Gothenburg, Sweden.
University of Gothenburg · SEHaukeland University Hospital · NOSahlgrenska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upper extremity functioning is important for achieving independence in activities of daily living (ADL). A better understanding of relationships between different aspects of independence in ADL after spinal cord injury (SCI) and upper extremity functioning is required to guide rehabilitation practices. To determine which aspects of independence in ADL are correlated with upper extremity functioning in individuals with cervical or thoracic SCI. A total of 25 adults (mean age 58.4 years, 72% men) with established cervical or thoracic SCI were recruited. Independence in ADL was assessed by Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM-III) and upper extremity functioning by kinematic measures (movement time, smoothness, and wrist angle during drinking task), grip strength, Upper Extremity Motor and Sensory Score, Box and Block Test (BBT), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and Upper Extremity Basic Data Set (ISCI-Hand and ISCI-Shoulder). Spearman correlation coefficients were used for data analyses. The SCIM-self-care subscale, particularly the feeding and dressing items, correlated moderately (r ≥ 0.5) with movement time and smoothness, grip strength, ARAT, BBT, and ISCI-Hand. The SCIM-respiration/sphincter subscale and the SCIM-mobility showed very low and low correlations with upper extremity assessments. However, at item level, respiration and bed/wheelchair mobility showed moderate correlations. Independence in self-care as domain and feeding/dressing, respiration and bed/wheelchair mobility as separate items were dependent on upper extremity functioning in individuals with cervical or thoracic SCI. Movement time and smoothness along with BBT, grip strength, ARAT, and ISCI-Hand can be used as indicators of independence in ADL. These findings can provide guidance to clinical practice in selection of upper extremity assessments in the context for ADL in individuals with SCI.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingSpinal Cord InjuriesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID36823179
PMCPMC9950049
OpenAlexW4321596474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.