Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36822879›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2023

Meat Consumption and Gut Microbiota: a Scoping Review of Literature and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials in Adults.

Yu Wang, Cassi N Uffelman, Robert E Bergia, Caroline M Clark, Jason B Reed, Tzu-Wen L Cross, Stephen R Lindemann, Minghua Tang, Wayne W Campbell

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewScoping Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Processing Status, Rather Than Meat Source, Is Associated with Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Among US Adults.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Gut microbiota, nutrients, and depression.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Review
  12. Comparative insights intoFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yu WangDepartment of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Cassi N UffelmanDepartment of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Robert E BergiaDepartment of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Caroline M ClarkDepartment of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Jason B ReedLibraries and School of Information Studies, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Tzu-Wen L CrossDepartment of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Stephen R LindemannDepartment of Food Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Minghua TangDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Wayne W CampbellDepartment of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. Electronic address: campbellw@purdue.edu.
Purdue University West Lafayette · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging research indicates the importance of gut microbiota in mediating the relationship between meat intake and human health outcomes. We aimed to assess the state of available scientific literature on meat intake and gut microbiota in humans (PROSPERO, International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, CRD42020135649). We first conducted a scoping review to identify observational and interventional studies on this topic. Searches were performed for English language articles using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and CINAHL (Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases from inception to August 2021 and using keywords related to meat (inclusive of mammalian, avian, and aquatic subtypes) and gut microbiota. Of 14,680 records, 85 eligible articles were included in the scoping review, comprising 57 observational and 28 interventional studies. One prospective observational study and 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified in adults without diagnosed disease. We included the 13 RCTs, comprising 18 comparisons, in the systematic review to assess the effects of higher and lower intakes of total meat and meat subtypes on the gut microbiota composition. The bacterial composition was differentially affected by consuming diets with and without meat or with varied meat subtypes. For example, higher meat intake tended to decrease population sizes of genera Anerostipes and Faecalibacterium, but it increased the population size of Roseburia across studies. However, the magnitude and directionality of most microbial responses varied, with inconsistent patterns of responses across studies. The data were insufficient for comparison within or between meat subtypes. The paucity of research, especially among meat subtypes, and heterogeneity of findings underscore the need for more well-designed prospective studies and full-feeding RCTs to address the relationships between and effects of consuming total meat and meat subtypes on gut microbiota, respectively.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAdultAnimalsDietHumansMammalsMeatObservational Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicanimal-based protein sourcesdietary patternfishpoultryred meatseafood

Identifiers

PMID36822879
PMCPMC10229385
OpenAlexW4312055803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.