Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36822819›Full record

ArticleBMJ mental health2023

Decoding fMRI alcohol cue reactivity and its association with drinking behaviour.

Haoye Tan, Martin Fungisai Gerchen, Patrick Bach, Alycia M Lee, Oliver Hummel, Wolfgang Sommer, Peter Kirsch, Falk Kiefer, Sabine Vollstädt-Klein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ mental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Haoye TanDepartment of Addictive Behaviour and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty of Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany haoye.tan@zi-mannheim.de.ORCID 0000-0002-9689-0583
Martin Fungisai GerchenDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty of Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Patrick BachDepartment of Addictive Behaviour and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty of Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5962-019X
Alycia M LeeDepartment of Addictive Behaviour and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty of Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Oliver HummelFaculty of Computer Science, Hochschule Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Wolfgang SommerDepartment of Addictive Behaviour and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty of Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Peter KirschDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty of Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Falk KieferDepartment of Addictive Behaviour and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty of Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Sabine Vollstädt-KleinDepartment of Addictive Behaviour and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty of Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6210-672X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCue reactivity, the enhanced sensitivity to conditioned cues, is associated with habitual and compulsive alcohol consumption. However, most previous studies in alcohol use disorder (AUD) compared brain activity between alcohol and neutral conditions, solely as cue-triggered neural reactivity.

objectiveThis study aims to find the neural subprocesses during the processing of visual alcohol cues in AUD individuals, and how these neural patterns are predictive for relapse.

methodsUsing cue reactivity and rating tasks, we separately modelled the patterns decoding the processes of visual object recognition and reward appraisal of alcohol cues with representational similarity analysis, and compared the decoding involvements (ie, distance between neural responses and hypothesised decoding models) between AUD and healthy individuals. We further explored connectivity between the identified neural systems and the whole brain and predicted relapse within 6 months using decoding involvements of the neural patterns.

findingsAUD individuals, compared with healthy individuals, showed higher involvement of motor-related brain regions in decoding visual features, and their reward, habit and executive networks were more engaged in appraising reward values. Connectivity analyses showed the involved neural systems were widely connected with higher cognitive networks during alcohol cue processing in AUD individuals, and decoding involvements of frontal eye fields and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex could contribute to relapse prediction.

conclusionsThese findings provide insight into how AUD individuals differently decode alcohol cues compared with healthy participants, from the componential processes of visual object recognition and reward appraisal. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The identified patterns are suggested as biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets in AUD.

Indexed as

AlcoholismMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlcohol DrinkingCuesHumansRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID36822819
PMCPMC10035780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.