Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36822807›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Evaluating the implementation of community engagement guidelines (EVALUA GPS project): a study protocol.

Viola Cassetti, María Victoria López-Ruiz, Marta Domínguez, Alba Gallego-Royo, Ana María García, Vicente Gea-Caballero, Catalina Nuñez, Joan Josep Paredes-Carbonell, Luis Angel Pérula-De Torres, Marina Pola-Garcia and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Viola CassettiIndependent Researcher, Castellón, Spain.
María Victoria López-RuizGovernment of Andalusia Andalusian Health Service, Sevilla, Spain mvloru82@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0379-3758
Marta DomínguezHealth Research Institute Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain.
Alba Gallego-RoyoHealth Research Institute Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4727-7624
Ana María GarcíaUniversity of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Vicente Gea-CaballeroFaculty of Health Science, Valencian International University, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8607-3195
Catalina NuñezHealth Promotion Service, General Directorate of Public Health, Balearic Islands, Spain.
Joan Josep Paredes-CarbonellLa Ribera Health Department, Primary Care Management, Valencia, Spain.
Luis Angel Pérula-De TorresInstituto Maimonides de Investigacion Biomedica de Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain.
Marina Pola-GarciaHealth Research Institute Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5046-2738
EvaluAGPS Research Group
Carmen Belen Benedé AzagraHealth Research Institute Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe EVALUA GPS project aims to evaluate the impact of the implementation of the National Institute for Health Care and Excellence (NICE) guideline 'Community engagement: improving health and well-being and reducing health inequalities' adapted to the Spanish context. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Phase I: A tool will be designed to evaluate the impact of implementing the recommendations of the adapted NICE guideline. The tool will be developed through a review of the literature on implementation of public health guidelines between 2000 and 2021 and an expert's panel consensus. PHASE II: The developed tool will be implemented in 16 community-based programmes, acting as intervention sites, and 4 controls through a quasi-experimental pre-post study. Phase III: A final online web tool, based on all previously collected information, will be developed to support the implementation of the adapted NICE guidelines recommendations in other contexts and programmes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data will be collected through surveys and semistructured interviews. Quantitative and qualitative data will be analysed to identify implementation scenarios, changes in community engagement approaches, and barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the recommendations. All this information will be further synthesised to develop the online tool. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The proposed research has been approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Aragon. Results will be presented at national and international conferences and published in peer-reviewed open access journals. The interactive online tool (phase III) will include examples of its application from the fieldwork.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationGuidelines as TopicPublic HealthHumansReview Literature as Topicprotocols & guidelinespublic healthqualitative researchsocial medicine

Identifiers

PMID36822807
PMCPMC9950881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.