Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36822806›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2023

Multicentre open label randomised controlled trial of immediate enhanced ambulatory ECG monitoring versus standard monitoring in acute unexplained syncope patients: the ASPIRED study.

Matthew J Reed, Neil Grubb, Chris Lang, Steve Goodacre, Rachel O'Brien, Christopher J Weir, Praveen Thokala, Nicola Freeman, Caroline Blackstock, Lynn Dinsmore and 5 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. The Arrhythmic Burden of Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Comprehensive Review.Heart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart Association · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Matthew J ReedEmergency Medicine Research Group Edinburgh (EMERGE), Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK v1mreed3@ed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1308-4824
Neil GrubbDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Chris LangDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Steve GoodacreSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0803-8444
Rachel O'BrienEmergency Medicine Research Group Edinburgh (EMERGE), Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Christopher J WeirEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6494-4903
Praveen ThokalaSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Nicola FreemanEmergency Medicine Research Group Edinburgh (EMERGE), Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Caroline BlackstockEmergency Medicine Research Group Edinburgh (EMERGE), Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Lynn DinsmoreEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Julia BoydEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Imad AdamestamEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Pam MacraeASPIRED study Patient Advisory Group, Edinburgh, UK.
Robert HanniganASPIRED study Patient Advisory Group, Edinburgh, UK.
Trudie LobbanASPIRED study Patient Advisory Group, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation CS/F/20/190016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDiagnosing underlying arrhythmia in emergency department (ED) syncope patients is difficult. There is a evidence that diagnostic yield for detecting underlying arrhythmia is highest when cardiac monitoring devices are applied early, ideally at the index visit. This strategy has the potential to change current syncope management from low diagnostic yield Holter to higher yield ambulatory monitoring, reduce episodes of syncope, reduce risk of recurrence and its potential serious consequences, reduce hospital admissions, reduce overall health costs and increase quality of life by allowing earlier diagnosis, treatment and exclusion of clinically important arrhythmias. METHODS AND ANALYSES: This is a UK open prospective parallel group multicentre randomised controlled trial of an immediate 14-day ambulatory patch heart monitor vs standard care in 2234 patients presenting acutely with unexplained syncope. Our patient focused primary endpoint will be number of episodes of syncope at 1 year. Health economic evaluation will estimate the incremental cost per syncope episode avoided and quality-adjusted life year gained. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Informed consent for participation will be sought. The ASPIRED trial received a favourable ethical opinion from South East Scotland Research Ethics Committee 01 (21/SS/0073). Results will be disseminated via scientific publication, lay summary and visual abstract. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 10278811.

Indexed as

Electrocardiography, AmbulatoryQuality of LifeArrhythmias, CardiacElectrocardiographyHumansProspective StudiesSyncopeACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINEAdult cardiologyCardiologyGENERAL MEDICINE (see Internal Medicine)Pacing & electrophysiology

Identifiers

PMID36822806
PMCPMC9950891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.