Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36821802›Full record

Observational studyJCO global oncology2023

Difference in Immunogenic Responses to COVID-19 Vaccines in Patients With Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy Versus Nonchemotherapy Treatment.

Walaipan Tantiyavarong, Prakongboon Sungkasubun, Worawit Chaiwiriyawong, Archara Supavavej, Piyarat Limpawittayakul, Bowon Weerasubpong, Jomtana Siripaibun, Chumut Phanthunane, Wisut Lamlertthon, Teerapat Ungtrakul and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JCO global oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Walaipan TantiyavarongDivision of Medical Oncology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3106-4341
Prakongboon SungkasubunDivision of Medical Oncology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Worawit ChaiwiriyawongDivision of Medical Oncology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Archara SupavavejDivision of Medical Oncology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-3270-5553
Piyarat LimpawittayakulDivision of Medical Oncology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Bowon WeerasubpongDivision of Medical Oncology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jomtana SiripaibunDivision of Medical Oncology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chumut PhanthunaneDivision of Medical Oncology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-0067-8965
Wisut LamlertthonFaculty of Medicine and Public Health, Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Teerapat UngtrakulFaculty of Medicine and Public Health, Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-0140-9866
Kriangkrai TawinpraiDepartment of Medicine, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2862-948X
Pichaya TantiyavarongDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-0793-794X
Chayanee SamdaengpanDivision of Medical Oncology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3180-4709
Chulabhorn Hospital · THThammasat University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe COVID-19 pandemic has affected public health worldwide. The efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines have been evaluated in the general population; however, data on patients with malignancies are limited.

methodsThis prospective longitudinal observational cohort study was conducted between June and July 2021. Enrolled adult patients with cancer were divided into chemotherapy and nonchemotherapy groups. All participants were immunized with two doses of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or CoronaVac COVID-19 vaccines. The primary outcome was a comparison of the immunogenicity (as assessed by spike protein [anti-S] immunoglobulin G [IgG] antibody titers) of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine in the chemotherapy and nonchemotherapy groups. The secondary outcomes included the anti-S IgG seroconversion rate and vaccine safety in both groups.

resultsAmong the 173 enrolled patients with solid cancer, after COVID-19 vaccination, the chemotherapy group had a significantly lower median anti-S IgG titer than the nonchemotherapy group (26

conclusionPatients with solid cancer receiving a COVID-19 vaccine while undergoing chemotherapy had lower immunogenicity responses to vaccination than those who were vaccinated while undergoing nonchemotherapy treatment. No statistically significant difference was observed in the COVID-19 vaccine safety profiles between groups.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsAdultChAdOx1 nCoV-19COVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunoglobulin GPandemicsProspective StudiesVaccines, InactivatedChAdOx1 nCoV-19COVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin Gsinovac COVID-19 vaccineVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID36821802
PMCPMC10166411
OpenAlexW4321749719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.