ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2023
New insights into trait introgression with the look-ahead intercrossing strategy.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- G2H: A Precise Block-Scanning Strategy for Genetic Background Assessment in Maize Backcross Breeding.Genes · 2025Article
- A bi-stage data-driven process-based model for sorghum breeding and yield prediction: coupling explainable artificial intelligence and crop modeling.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Molecular and Morphological Characterization of Introgression Lines with Resistance to Bacterial Leaf Blight and Blast in Rice.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trait introgression (TI) can be a time-consuming and costly task that typically requires multiple generations of backcrossing (BC). Usually, the aim is to introduce one or more alleles (e.g. QTLs) from a single donor into an elite recipient, both of which are fully inbred. This article studies the potential advantages of incorporating intercrossing (IC) into TI programs when compared with relying solely on the traditional BC framework. We simulate a TI breeding pipeline using 3 previously proposed selection strategies for the traditional BC scheme and 3 modified strategies that allow IC. Our proposed look-ahead intercrossing method (LAS-IC) combines look-ahead Monte Carlo simulations, intercrossing, and additional selection criteria to improve computational efficiency. We compared the efficiency of the 6 strategies across 5 levels of resource availability considering the generation when the major QTLs have been successfully introduced into the recipient and a desired background recovery rate reached. Simulations demonstrate that the inclusion of intercrossing in a TI program can substantially increase efficiency and the probability of success. The proposed LAS-IC provides the highest probability of success across the different scenarios using fewer resources compared with BC-only strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.