Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36821539›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Prediction and diagnosis of chronic kidney disease development and progression using machine-learning: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of reporting standards and model performance.

Fangyue Chen, Piyawat Kantagowit, Tanawin Nopsopon, Arisa Chuklin, Krit Pongpirul

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07669142 (THE EFFECT OF TELE-NURSING PRACTICES ON QUALITY OF LIFE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH PREDIALYSIS CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07669142 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The effect of tele-nursing practices on quality of life and clinical outcomes in patients with predialysis chronic kidney disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul University - CerrahpasaRan2026 to 2027Enrolled66ConditionsTelenurse, CKD Stage 3/4ArmsStructured Telenursing Education, Counseling, and Follow-up Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fangyue ChenGlobal Health Partnerships, Health Education England, London, United Kingdom.
Piyawat KantagowitFaculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-7890-8356
Tanawin NopsoponFaculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Arisa ChuklinFaculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Krit PongpirulFaculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3818-9761

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic Kidney disease (CKD) is an important yet under-recognized contributor to morbidity and mortality globally. Machine-learning (ML) based decision support tools have been developed across many aspects of CKD care. Notably, algorithms developed in the prediction and diagnosis of CKD development and progression may help to facilitate early disease prevention, assist with early planning of renal replacement therapy, and offer potential clinical and economic benefits to patients and health systems. Clinical implementation can be affected by the uncertainty surrounding the methodological rigor and performance of ML-based models. This systematic review aims to evaluate the application of prognostic and diagnostic ML tools in CKD development and progression. The protocol has been prepared using the Preferred Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. The systematic review protocol for CKD prediction and diagnosis have been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42022356704, CRD42022372378). A systematic search will be undertaken of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Web of Science, and the IEEE Xplore digital library. Studies in which ML has been applied to predict and diagnose CKD development and progression will be included. The primary outcome will be the comparison of the performance of ML-based models with non-ML-based models. Secondary analysis will consist of model use cases, model construct, and model reporting quality. This systematic review will offer valuable insight into the performance and reporting quality of ML-based models in CKD diagnosis and prediction. This will inform clinicians and technical specialists of the current development of ML in CKD care, as well as direct future model development and standardization.

Indexed as

Continuous Renal Replacement TherapyRenal Insufficiency, ChronicHumansMachine LearningMeta-Analysis as TopicSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID36821539
PMCPMC9949618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.