Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36821519›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2023

Analysis of Protein Folding Simulation with Moving Root Mean Square Deviation.

Yutaka Maruyama, Ryo Igarashi, Yoshitaka Ushiku, Ayori Mitsutake

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Theta-Defensin Proteins: Conformational Variability and Environmental Effects.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yutaka MaruyamaOMRON SINIC X Corporation, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4035-4885
Ryo IgarashiOMRON SINIC X Corporation, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Yoshitaka UshikuOMRON SINIC X Corporation, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Ayori MitsutakeDepartment of Physics, School of Science and Technology, Meiji University, 1-1-1 Higashi-Mita, Tama-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa 214-8571, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4194-7255

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We apply moving root-mean-square deviation (mRMSD), which does not require a reference structure, as a method for analyzing protein dynamics. This method can be used to calculate the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) of structure between two specified time points and to analyze protein dynamics behavior through time series analysis. We applied this method to the Trp-cage trajectory calculated by the Anton supercomputer and found that it shows regions of stable states as well as the conventional RMSD. In addition, we extracted a characteristic structure in which the side chains of Asp1 and Arg16 form hydrogen bonds near the most stable structure of the Trp-cage. We also determined that ≥20 ns is an appropriate time interval to investigate protein dynamics using mRMSD. Applying this method to NuG2 protein, we found that mRMSD can be used to detect regions of metastable states in addition to the stable state. This method can be applied to molecular dynamics simulations of proteins whose stable structures are unknown.

Indexed as

PeptidesProteinsComputersMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein FoldingPeptidesProteins

Identifiers

PMID36821519
PMCPMC10015464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read7
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.