ArticleJCI insight2023
Full-length optic nerve regeneration in the absence of genetic manipulations.
Article in JCI insight, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Frontiers of optic nerve regeneration research: an analysis of the top 100 most influential articles in the field from 2005 to 2025.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
- The internal limiting basement membrane inhibits functional engraftment of transplanted human retinal ganglion cells in vivo.Science translational medicine · 2026Article
- The 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY-100635 maleate promotes retinal ganglion cell differentiation and protects the retino-visual circuits.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- AxoMetric platform facilitates rapid and unbiased automated quantification of axon regeneration in tissue sections.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- From Regeneration Failure to Functional Restoration: Unlocking the Neuronal-Intrinsic Regenerative Capacity as a Therapeutic Frontier for Optic Neuropathy and Glaucoma.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Multifunctional nanoplatforms for optic nerve regeneration integrating anti-inflammatory, epigenetic, and ionic mechanisms with emerging artificial intelligence technologies.Cell biology and toxicology · 2025Review
- TPEN loaded poly (lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles promote neuroprotection and optic nerve regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- The neuroimmune interface in retinal regeneration.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2025Review
- Preserving blood-retinal barrier integrity: a path to retinal ganglion cell protection in glaucoma and traumatic optic neuropathy.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2025Review
- Single-Nuclei Sequencing Reveals a Robust Corticospinal Response to Nearby Axotomy But Overall Insensitivity to Spinal Injury.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Toxic Advanced Glycation End-Products Inhibit Axonal Elongation Mediated by β-Tubulin Aggregation in Mice Optic Nerves.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Concept of Normativity in Multi-Omics Analysis of Axon Regeneration.Biomolecules · 2024Article
- Injury distance limits the transcriptional response to spinal injury.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Optic nerve regeneration: Potential treatment approaches.Current opinion in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Unlocking the potential for optic nerve regeneration over long distances: a multi-therapeutic intervention.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
- Inflammatory Mediators of Axon Regeneration in the Central and Peripheral Nervous Systems.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The inability of mature retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) to regenerate axons after optic nerve injury can be partially reversed by manipulating cell-autonomous and/or -nonautonomous factors. Although manipulations of cell-nonautonomous factors could have higher translational potential than genetic manipulations of RGCs, they have generally produced lower levels of optic nerve regeneration. Here, we report that preconditioning resulting from mild lens injury (conditioning LI, cLI) before optic nerve damage induced far greater regeneration than LI after nerve injury or the pro-inflammatory agent zymosan given either before or after nerve damage. Unlike zymosan-induced regeneration, cLI was unaltered by depleting mature neutrophils or T cells or blocking receptors for known inflammation-derived growth factors (oncomodulin, stromal cell-derived factor 1, CCL5) and was only partly diminished by suppressing CCR2+ monocyte recruitment. Repeated episodes of LI led to full-length optic nerve regeneration, and pharmacological removal of local resident macrophages with the colony stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibitor PLX5622 enabled some axons to reinnervate the brain in just 6 weeks, comparable to the results obtained with the most effective genetic manipulations of RGCs. Thus, cell-nonautonomous interventions can induce high levels of optic nerve regeneration, paving the way to uncovering potent, translatable therapeutic targets for CNS repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.