Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36821373›Full record

ArticleMedical education online2023

Using learning analytics in clinical competency committees: Increasing the impact of competency-based medical education.

Patricia A Carney, Stefanie S Sebok-Syer, Martin V Pusic, Colleen C Gillespie, Marjorie Westervelt, Mary Ellen J Goldhamer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education online, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cost and Challenges of Clinical Competency Committees and Milestones Assessment.Journal of medical education and curricular development
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia A CarneyProfessor of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2937-655X
Stefanie S Sebok-SyerEmergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Martin V PusicEmergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Colleen C GillespieMedicine, New York University New York, NY, USA.
Marjorie WesterveltDirector of Assessment, Evaluation and Scholarship, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Mary Ellen J GoldhamerMedicine, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard University · USNew York University · USOregon Health & Science University · USStanford University · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graduate medical education (GME) and Clinical Competency Committees (CCC) have been evolving to monitor trainee progression using competency-based medical education principles and outcomes, though evidence suggests CCCs fall short of this goal. Challenges include that evaluation data are often incomplete, insufficient, poorly aligned with performance, conflicting or of unknown quality, and CCCs struggle to organize, analyze, visualize, and integrate data elements across sources, collection methods, contexts, and time-periods, which makes advancement decisions difficult. Learning analytics have significant potential to improve competence committee decision making, yet their use is not yet commonplace. Learning analytics (LA) is the interpretation of multiple data sources gathered on trainees to assess academic progress, predict future performance, and identify potential issues to be addressed with feedback and individualized learning plans. What distinguishes LA from other educational approaches is systematic data collection and advanced digital interpretation and visualization to inform educational systems. These data are necessary to: 1) fully understand educational contexts and guide improvements; 2) advance proficiency among stakeholders to make ethical and accurate summative decisions; and 3) clearly communicate methods, findings, and actionable recommendations for a range of educational stakeholders. The ACGME released the third edition CCC Guidebook for Programs in 2020 and the 2021 Milestones 2.0 supplement of the Journal of Graduate Medical Education (JGME Supplement) presented important papers that describe evaluation and implementation features of effective CCCs. Principles of LA underpin national GME outcomes data and training across specialties; however, little guidance currently exists on how GME programs can use LA to improve the CCC process. Here we outline recommendations for implementing learning analytics for supporting decision making on trainee progress in two areas: 1) Data Quality and Decision Making, and 2) Educator Development.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyClinical CompetenceCompetency-Based EducationEducation, Medical, GraduateHumansLearningClinical Competency CommitteesCompetency-based medical educationgraduate medical educationLearning AnalyticsRessident Assessment

Identifiers

PMID36821373
PMCPMC9970252
OpenAlexW4321611136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.