ArticleMedical education online2023
Using learning analytics in clinical competency committees: Increasing the impact of competency-based medical education.
Article in Medical education online, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Learning Analytics of a National Entrustable Professional Activities Platform: Cross-Sectional Study of System-Level Constraints on Advanced Entrustment in Competency-Based Medical Education.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Organizing and Improving Outcomes for Changing Teaching in Neurological Surgery Residency Using Innovation.Cureus · 2026Article
- Climbing the ladder of confidence: effects of the step ladder system on medical students' self-efficacy during a surgical clerkship.BMC medical education · 2026Observational
- Leveraging ChatGPT to support terminology learning in oral anatomy: a mixed-methods study among linguistically diverse dental students.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Lessons From Reimagining Residency and the Future of Innovation in Graduate Medical Education.Journal of graduate medical education · 2025Article
- Resident clinical dashboards to support precision education in emergency medicine.AEM education and training · 2025Review
- An Automated System for Physician Trainee Procedure Logging via Electronic Health Records.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence empowering public health education: prospects and challenges.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Supporting validity: steps to contextualise applications for technology and assessment, for learning.MedEdPublish (2016) · 2023Article
- Cost and Challenges of Clinical Competency Committees and Milestones Assessment.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Graduate medical education (GME) and Clinical Competency Committees (CCC) have been evolving to monitor trainee progression using competency-based medical education principles and outcomes, though evidence suggests CCCs fall short of this goal. Challenges include that evaluation data are often incomplete, insufficient, poorly aligned with performance, conflicting or of unknown quality, and CCCs struggle to organize, analyze, visualize, and integrate data elements across sources, collection methods, contexts, and time-periods, which makes advancement decisions difficult. Learning analytics have significant potential to improve competence committee decision making, yet their use is not yet commonplace. Learning analytics (LA) is the interpretation of multiple data sources gathered on trainees to assess academic progress, predict future performance, and identify potential issues to be addressed with feedback and individualized learning plans. What distinguishes LA from other educational approaches is systematic data collection and advanced digital interpretation and visualization to inform educational systems. These data are necessary to: 1) fully understand educational contexts and guide improvements; 2) advance proficiency among stakeholders to make ethical and accurate summative decisions; and 3) clearly communicate methods, findings, and actionable recommendations for a range of educational stakeholders. The ACGME released the third edition CCC Guidebook for Programs in 2020 and the 2021 Milestones 2.0 supplement of the Journal of Graduate Medical Education (JGME Supplement) presented important papers that describe evaluation and implementation features of effective CCCs. Principles of LA underpin national GME outcomes data and training across specialties; however, little guidance currently exists on how GME programs can use LA to improve the CCC process. Here we outline recommendations for implementing learning analytics for supporting decision making on trainee progress in two areas: 1) Data Quality and Decision Making, and 2) Educator Development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.