ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2023
Estimation of Visual Function Using Deep Learning From Ultra-Widefield Fundus Images of Eyes With Retinitis Pigmentosa.
Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Based Classification of Retinitis Pigmentosa from Color Fundus Images: A Reproducible Benchmark and Screening-Oriented Pipeline.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An Ensemble Learning Artificial Intelligence Model for Alzheimer's Disease Detection Using OCT.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Visual Field Estimation in X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa Associated with Retinitis Pigmentosa GTPase Regulator (Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Leveraging large scale deep learning models for diagnosis and visual outcome prediction in retinitis pigmentosa.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Classification of Inherited Retinal Diseases Using Artificial Intelligence Models for Fundus Autofluorescence and Ultrawide Retinal Images.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Article
- Early detection and staging of retinitis pigmentosa using multifocal electroretinogram parameters and machine learning algorithms.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025Article
- Classification of fundus autofluorescence images based on macular function in retinitis pigmentosa using convolutional neural networks.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2025Observational
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Early Diagnosis of Retinal Diseases.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Cataract surgery in retinitis pigmentosa.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2024Review
- Hyperautofluorescent Ring Pattern in Retinitis Pigmentosa: Clinical Implications and Modifications Over Time.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Observational
- Comparison of Microperimetry and Static Perimetry for Evaluating Macular Function and Progression in Retinitis Pigmentosa.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: There is no widespread effective treatment to halt the progression of retinitis pigmentosa. Consequently, adequate assessment and estimation of residual visual function are important clinically. Objective: To examine whether deep learning can accurately estimate the visual function of patients with retinitis pigmentosa by using ultra-widefield fundus images obtained on concurrent visits. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data for this multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional study were collected between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2018. This study included 695 consecutive patients with retinitis pigmentosa who were examined at 5 institutions. Each of the 3 types of input images-ultra-widefield pseudocolor images, ultra-widefield fundus autofluorescence images, and both ultra-widefield pseudocolor and fundus autofluorescence images-was paired with 1 of the 31 types of ensemble models constructed from 5 deep learning models (Visual Geometry Group-16, Residual Network-50, InceptionV3, DenseNet121, and EfficientNetB0). We used 848, 212, and 214 images for the training, validation, and testing data, respectively. All data from 1 institution were used for the independent testing data. Data analysis was performed from June 7, 2021, to December 5, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: The mean deviation on the Humphrey field analyzer, central retinal sensitivity, and best-corrected visual acuity were estimated. The image type-ensemble model combination that yielded the smallest mean absolute error was defined as the model with the best estimation accuracy. After removal of the bias of including both eyes with the generalized linear mixed model, correlations between the actual values of the testing data and the estimated values by the best accuracy model were examined by calculating standardized regression coefficients and P values. Results: The study included 1274 eyes of 695 patients. A total of 385 patients were female (55.4%), and the mean (SD) age was 53.9 (17.2) years. Among the 3 types of images, the model using ultra-widefield fundus autofluorescence images alone provided the best estimation accuracy for mean deviation, central sensitivity, and visual acuity. Standardized regression coefficients were 0.684 (95% CI, 0.567-0.802) for the mean deviation estimation, 0.697 (95% CI, 0.590-0.804) for the central sensitivity estimation, and 0.309 (95% CI, 0.187-0.430) for the visual acuity estimation (all P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study suggest that the visual function estimation in patients with retinitis pigmentosa from ultra-widefield fundus autofluorescence images using deep learning might help assess disease progression objectively. Findings also suggest that deep learning models might monitor the progression of retinitis pigmentosa efficiently during follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.