Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36821015›Full record

ArticleChild psychiatry and human development2024

Using Behavioral Measures to Assess Suicide Risk in the Psychiatric Emergency Department for Youth.

Ki Eun Shin, Argelinda Baroni, Ruth S Gerson, Kerri-Anne Bell, Olivia H Pollak, Katherine Tezanos, Anthony Spirito, Christine B Cha

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Child psychiatry and human development, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ki Eun ShinDepartment of Behavioral Sciences, Long Island University, Post Campus, Brookville, NY, USA.
Argelinda BaroniDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Ruth S GersonDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Kerri-Anne BellDepartment of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Olivia H PollakDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Katherine TezanosDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Anthony SpiritoDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Christine B ChaDepartment of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. cbc2120@tc.columbia.edu.
Brown University · USNew York University · USColumbia University · USLong Island University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Notre Dame · US

Funding

American Foundation for Suicide Prevention YIG-2-026-16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suicide screening is critical in pediatric emergency departments (EDs). Behavioral measures of suicide risk may complement self-report measures. The current study examines suicide-specific behavioral measures and tests their potential short-term within-person effects among respondents, ability to discriminate future suicide attempt from suicidal ideation, and translation into interpretable categorical composite scores. The sample included 167 youth (10-17 years), presenting for suicide-related reasons to a pediatric psychiatric ED. During their ED visit, participants completed the Death/Life Implicit Association Test (IAT) and the Suicide Stroop Task. Recurrent suicidal thoughts and attempts were assessed within 6 months of the ED visit via medical records and email surveys. Youth displayed a decrease in the levels of distress and self-injurious desires (negative mood, desire to hurt themselves, and desire to die) after completing the behavioral tasks. The Death/Life IAT prospectively differentiated with 68% accuracy between youth who attempted suicide after their ED visit and those who had suicidal ideation but no attempt, p = 0.04, OR = 5.65, although this effect became marginally significant after controlling for self-report and demographic covariates. Neither the Suicide Stroop Task, nor the categorical composite scores predicted suicide attempts, ps = 0.08-0.87, ORs = 0.96-3.95. Behavioral measures of suicide risk administered in the ED do not appear to increase distress or self-injurious desires. They may be able to distinguish those who go on to attempt suicide (vs. consider suicide) within six months after discharge.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalSuicidal IdeationSuicide, AttemptedAdolescentChildEmergency Services, PsychiatricFemaleHumansMaleRisk AssessmentEmergency departmentEmotional stroop taskImplicit association testSuicideYouth

Identifiers

PMID36821015
OpenAlexW4321595614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.