ArticlePsychological research2023
Action-effect knowledge transfers to similar effect stimuli.
Article in Psychological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- From exemplars to categories: generalization of action-effect learning in a free-choice task.Psychological research · 2026Article
- Learning and transfer of response-effect relations.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2026Article
- An attempt to replicate action-effect learning and its generalization without stimulus-stimulus learning.Psychological research · 2026Article
- Generalisation of unpredictable action-effect features: Large individual differences with little on-average effect.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024Article
- Modal and amodal cognition: an overarching principle in various domains of psychology.Psychological research · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability to anticipate the sensory consequences of our actions (i.e., action-effects) is known to be important for intentional action initiation and control. Learned action-effects can select the responses that previously have been associated with them. What has been largely unexplored is how learned action-effect associations can aid action selection for effects that have not previously associated with an action but are similar to learned effects. In two studies, we aimed to show that when presented new, unknown action-effects, participants select the responses that have previously been associated with similar action-effects. In the first study (n = 27), action-effect similarity was operationalized via stimuli belonging to the same or different categories as the previously learned action-effects. In the second study (n = 31), action-effect similarity was realized via stimuli that require comparable motor responses in real life. Participants first learned that specific responses are followed by specific visual effect stimuli. In the test phase, learned effect stimuli, new but similar effect stimuli and new but dissimilar effect stimuli were presented ahead of the response. The findings revealed that both learned effect stimuli and new similar effect stimuli affected response times, whereas new dissimilar effects did not. When a learned or a new similar effect was followed by a learned response, compared to an unlearned response, the responses were faster. We interpret these findings in terms of action-effect learning. The action-effect once bound to an action is used to select an action if a similar effect for which no action has been learned yet is presented. However, it is noteworthy that, due to our design, other explanations for the found transfer are conceivable. We address these limitations in the General Discussion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.