Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36821009›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2023

Action-effect knowledge transfers to similar effect stimuli.

Sarah Esser, Hilde Haider, Clarissa Lustig, Takumi Tanaka, Kanji Tanaka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Learning and transfer of response-effect relations.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah EsserDepartment of Cognitive Psychology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. Sarah.esser@uni-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9029-4297
Hilde HaiderDepartment of Cognitive Psychology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Clarissa LustigDepartment of Cognitive Psychology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Takumi TanakaGraduate School of Humanities and Sociology and Faculty of Letters, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kanji TanakaFaculty of Arts and Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Funding

DAAD-JSPS Joint Research Program 57610537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to anticipate the sensory consequences of our actions (i.e., action-effects) is known to be important for intentional action initiation and control. Learned action-effects can select the responses that previously have been associated with them. What has been largely unexplored is how learned action-effect associations can aid action selection for effects that have not previously associated with an action but are similar to learned effects. In two studies, we aimed to show that when presented new, unknown action-effects, participants select the responses that have previously been associated with similar action-effects. In the first study (n = 27), action-effect similarity was operationalized via stimuli belonging to the same or different categories as the previously learned action-effects. In the second study (n = 31), action-effect similarity was realized via stimuli that require comparable motor responses in real life. Participants first learned that specific responses are followed by specific visual effect stimuli. In the test phase, learned effect stimuli, new but similar effect stimuli and new but dissimilar effect stimuli were presented ahead of the response. The findings revealed that both learned effect stimuli and new similar effect stimuli affected response times, whereas new dissimilar effects did not. When a learned or a new similar effect was followed by a learned response, compared to an unlearned response, the responses were faster. We interpret these findings in terms of action-effect learning. The action-effect once bound to an action is used to select an action if a similar effect for which no action has been learned yet is presented. However, it is noteworthy that, due to our design, other explanations for the found transfer are conceivable. We address these limitations in the General Discussion.

Indexed as

CognitionLearningHumansKnowledgeReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID36821009
PMCPMC10457235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.