ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2023
Botulinum toxin in clinical practice: state of the art of administration provisions in Italy.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Mind the gap: a German case study on the discrepancy between geographic accessibility and real-world utilization of botulinum toxin therapy.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Botulinum neurotoxin type A is a remarkable therapeutic approach for muscle hyperactivity syndromes, pain, and related disorders. Despite its wide application in neurology, there is a poor knowledge on delivery protocols and dispatch from the healthcare providers. In this study, we reported the result of a 2020 survey about the administration provisions of botulinum neurotoxin type A in Italy. Seven questions including information on characteristics of botulinum neurotoxin facilities, prescription, reimbursement, and execution modalities were adopted. Sixty participants answered the survey. Despite the wide availability of dedicated centers all over the national territory, there was a surprising lack of standardized and shared administration provisions. Most of the Italian medical structures delivered botulinum neurotoxin through outpatient clinics located in public hospital facilities, through the "F file" reimbursement modality. However, there was no agreement on the reimbursement request modality, creating differences in public costs relative to the botulinum toxin consumption across Italy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36820989What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.