Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36820983›Full record

ArticleRheumatology and therapy2023

Response to Treatment with Intravenous Golimumab or Infliximab in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: PROMIS Results from the Real-World Observational Phase 4 AWARE Study.

Clifton O Bingham, Shawn Black, Natalie J Shiff, Stephen Xu, Wayne Langholff, Jeffrey R Curtis

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02728934 (Comparative and Pragmatic Study of Simponi Aria Versus Remicade in Rheumatoid Arthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02728934 completednot on this map

Comparative and Pragmatic Study of Simponi Aria Versus Remicade in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorJanssen Scientific Affairs, LLCRan2016 to 2020Enrolled1,279ConditionsArthritis, RheumatoidArmsGolimumab Intravenous (IV), Infliximab, Biosimilar Infliximab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Clifton O BinghamJohns Hopkins Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University, 5200 Eastern Ave, MFL Center Tower, Room 434A, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA. cbingha2@jhmi.edu.
Shawn BlackDepartment of Immunology, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA.
Natalie J ShiffDepartment of Immunology, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA.
Stephen XuDepartment of Biostatistics, Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA.
Wayne LangholffDepartment of Biostatistics, Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA.
Jeffrey R CurtisDepartment of Medicine, Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Janssen (United States) · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo assess changes in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS

methodsAWARE was a prospective, noninterventional, multicenter, observational, U.S.-based phase 4 study of 1270 RA patients who initiated treatment with IV golimumab or infliximab. PROMIS-29 and PROMIS short form (SF) Fatigue 7a and Pain Interference 6b questionnaires were administered at baseline and infusions 2, 5, and 8 (approximately weeks  4, 28, and 52 for IV golimumab and weeks  2, 22, and 46 for infliximab). Mean changes from baseline in all PROMIS-29 domains and respective SFs and response rates for achieving ≥ 3, ≥ 5, or ≥ 10-point improvements were determined.

resultsAmong all patients, baseline mean ± SD PROMIS T-scores were consistent between treatment groups and indicated worse physical function (38.2 ± 6.8 IV golimumab, 38.0 ± 6.9 infliximab), more pain interference (63.0 ± 7.6 IV golimumab, 63.9 ± 7.8 infliximab), and greater fatigue (58.4 ± 9.9 IV golimumab, 59.4 ± 10.0 infliximab) in these patients vs the general U.S. population (T-score = 50). Through the 8th infusion of either treatment, IV golimumab- and infliximab-treated patients achieved meaningful improvements (≥ 3-point improvement in T-scores) in all PROMIS-29 domains and respective SFs, and the proportions of patients with ≥ 3, ≥ 5, or ≥ 10-point improvements in T-scores increased from infusion 2 through infusion 8.

conclusionsRA patients treated with IV golimumab or infliximab achieved comparable improvements across social, mental, and physical well-being PROMIS measures. Additionally, PROMIS detected meaningful clinical changes in patient-reported outcomes in both treatment groups. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02728934.

Indexed as

DepressionFatigueInfliximabIntravenous golimumabObservational studyPain interferencePatient-reported outcomesPhysical functionPROMISRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID36820983
PMCPMC10140242
OpenAlexW4321611533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.