Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36820930›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2023

Improving the Quantitative Analysis of Breast Microcalcifications: A Multiscale Approach.

Chrysostomos Marasinou, Bo Li, Jeremy Paige, Akinyinka Omigbodun, Noor Nakhaei, Anne Hoyt, William Hsu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chrysostomos MarasinouMedical & Imaging Informatics, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 924 Westwood Blvd, Ste 420, Los Angeles, 90024, USA.
Bo LiDepartment of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, 90095, CA, USA.
Jeremy PaigeDepartment of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, 90095, CA, USA.
Akinyinka OmigbodunMedical & Imaging Informatics, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 924 Westwood Blvd, Ste 420, Los Angeles, 90024, USA.
Noor NakhaeiDepartment of Computer Science, UCLA Samueli School of Engineering, Los Angeles, 90095, CA, USA.
Anne HoytDepartment of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, 90095, CA, USA.
William HsuMedical & Imaging Informatics, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 924 Westwood Blvd, Ste 420, Los Angeles, 90024, USA. whsu@mednet.ucla.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5168-070X

Funding

UCLA Clinical Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001881 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARLEEN F. BROWN, ARASH NAEIM · 2016 to 2026
$118.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate characterization of microcalcifications (MCs) in 2D digital mammography is a necessary step toward reducing the diagnostic uncertainty associated with the callback of indeterminate MCs. Quantitative analysis of MCs can better identify MCs with a higher likelihood of ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive cancer. However, automated identification and segmentation of MCs remain challenging with high false positive rates. We present a two-stage multiscale approach to MC segmentation in 2D full-field digital mammograms (FFDMs) and diagnostic magnification views. Candidate objects are first delineated using blob detection and Hessian analysis. A regression convolutional network, trained to output a function with a higher response near MCs, chooses the objects which constitute actual MCs. The method was trained and validated on 435 screening and diagnostic FFDMs from two separate datasets. We then used our approach to segment MCs on magnification views of 248 cases with amorphous MCs. We modeled the extracted features using gradient tree boosting to classify each case as benign or malignant. Compared to state-of-the-art comparison methods, our approach achieved superior mean intersection over the union (0.670 ± 0.121 per image versus 0.524 ± 0.034 per image), intersection over the union per MC object (0.607 ± 0.250 versus 0.363 ± 0.278) and true positive rate of 0.744 versus 0.581 at 0.4 false positive detections per square centimeter. Features generated using our approach outperformed the comparison method (0.763 versus 0.710 AUC) in distinguishing amorphous calcifications as benign or malignant.

Indexed as

Breast DiseasesBreast NeoplasmsCalcinosisFemaleHumansMammographyProbabilityRadiographic Image EnhancementBreast cancerFull-field digital mammographyMicrocalcificationsSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID36820930
PMCPMC10287598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.