Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36820919›Full record

ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2023

[Development of two outpatient interdisciplinary group modules in the treatment of patients with pain and risk of chronification].

Anke Preißler, Leonie Schouten, Greta Hoffmann, Karin Deppe, Gabriele Lindena, Frank Petzke, Anne Gärtner, Ulrike Kaiser

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anke PreißlerUniversitätsSchmerzCentrum, Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland. anke.preissler@uniklinikum-dresden.de.
Leonie SchoutenSchmerzmedizin, Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Greta HoffmannUniversitätsSchmerzCentrum, Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
Karin DeppeSchmerzmedizin, Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Gabriele LindenaDeutsche Schmerzgesellschaft e. V., Berlin, Deutschland.
Frank PetzkeSchmerzmedizin, Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Anne GärtnerUniversitätsSchmerzCentrum, Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
Ulrike KaiserKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveAn early treatment of patients who suffer from pain and show risk factors for chronification is meaningful as these patients can benefit from an early interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatment (IMST). In view of the insufficient treatment, two outpatient treatment modules for the secondary prevention of pain chronification are developed within the framework of PAIN2020: the educative and accompanying IMST (E‑IMST and B‑IMST). MATERIAL AND

methodsThe developmental process of both IMSTs is presented. In this context two target groups of patients were defined for which 1 session (E‑IMST) or 10 intervention appointments (B‑IMST) were planned, depending on the chronification, impairment and complexity of the disorder. The conception was carried out in five steps: development of the objectives, development of the main contents, workshop on the content and conceptional design (contents, mediation, exercises), preparation of a time schedule and processing of the results (manual, presentations, worksheets, handbook). The B‑IMST was initially developed from which the contents for the E‑IMST were subsequently extracted. Additionally, a concept for testing the feasibility and a working model for a pilot study were developed.

resultsThe objectives for both forms of IMST are improvement of the understanding of pain and contributing factors, the increase of the experience of control and self-efficacy and the increase in self-responsibility with respect to strategies to reduce pain. Differences between the two treatment modules arise from the needs and framework conditions. Medical, physiotherapeutic and psychotherapeutic contents and schedules were organized for both IMST modules. The B‑IMST consists of five modules each with two sessions as group interventions (biopsychosocial model, activation planning, regulation of needs, sleep and medication, routine transfer). The 3‑h E‑IMST group intervention mainly intends to mediate knowledge on pain and the biopsychosocial pain model. Theoretical and practical interventions, empirical knowledge and experience-oriented methods are employed.

conclusionThere are now two interdisciplinary structured manuals for the secondary preventive treatment of patients with recurrent pain and a risk profile for chronification. These approaches must now prove themselves with respect to feasibility and effectiveness.

Indexed as

Chronic PainOutpatientsCombined Modality TherapyHumansPain ManagementPilot ProjectsCausal modelInterdisciplinary pain managementPain managementSecondary preventionTreatment manual

Identifiers

PMID36820919
PMCPMC10368578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.