Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36820912›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2023

Quantitative performance of digital ELISA for the highly sensitive quantification of viral proteins and influenza virus.

Takema Hasegawa, Sachie Shibayama, Yukiko Osumi, Hiroshi Sentsui, Megumi Kato

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takema HasegawaBio-Medical Standard Group, Research Institute for Material and Chemical Measurement, National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan. Hasegawa.takema@aist.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4678-6147
Sachie ShibayamaBio-Medical Standard Group, Research Institute for Material and Chemical Measurement, National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7631-4167
Yukiko OsumiBio-Medical Standard Group, Research Institute for Material and Chemical Measurement, National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Hiroshi SentsuiSensing System Research Center (SSRC), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9700-6705
Megumi KatoBio-Medical Standard Group, Research Institute for Material and Chemical Measurement, National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4930-4852
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A single-molecule assay (SiMoA) using a digital enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has been attracting attention as a promising method that can detect viruses with ultra-high sensitivity. However, the quantitative application of digital ELISA has not been adequately reported. Therefore, in this study, we first evaluated the linearity and sensitivity of digital ELISA using a Certified Reference Material of C-reactive protein (NMIJ CRM 6201-c) as a quality control material. Next, we originally screened those antibody pair that are suitable for detecting recombinant viral proteins of influenza A virus, nucleoprotein (NP), and hemagglutinin (HA), and established the measurement system. Under optimized conditions, the limit of detection (LOD) of NP and HA was 0.59 fM and 0.99 fM, and the coefficient of determination, R

Indexed as

Influenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeViral ProteinsAntibodies, ViralEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayInfluenza A Virus, H3N2 SubtypeAntibodies, ViralViral ProteinsDigital ELISAInfluenza virusQuantitative efficacySiMoA

Identifiers

PMID36820912
OpenAlexW4321611886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.