ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2023
Liquid-phase microextraction of aromatic amines: hollow fiber-liquid-phase microextraction and parallel artificial liquid membrane extraction comparison.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated Fe(III)-driven liquid-phase microextraction-spectrophotometry for selective and high-throughput detection of ethyl maltol in complex food samples.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Plug-and-play coaxial nested-tube supported liquid membrane extraction for the determination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in human plasma.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Are Microextraction Techniques Truly Green? A Critical Assessment of Green Sample Preparation Practices.Journal of separation science · 2026Review
- Vortex-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction for the simultaneous derivatization and extraction of five primary aliphatic amines in water sample.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparison of gas chromatographic techniques for the analysis of iodinated derivatives of aromatic amines.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2023Article
- Liquid-phase microextraction of aromatic amines: hollow fiber-liquid-phase microextraction and parallel artificial liquid membrane extraction comparison.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2023Article
- Efficient dispersive micro solid-phase extraction of antidepressant drugs by a robust molybdenum-based coordination polymer.Mikrochimica acta · 2021Article
- Development of Membrane-Based Inverted Liquid-Liquid Extraction for the Simultaneous Extraction of Eight Metals in Seawater before ICP-OES Analysis.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- High-Throughput Liquid-Liquid Extractions with Nanoliter Volumes.Analytical chemistry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Aromatic amines (AA) are carcinogenic compounds that can enter the human body through many sources, one of the most important being tobacco smoke. They are excreted with the urine, from which they can be extracted and measured. To that end, hollow fiber-liquid-phase microextraction (HF-LPME) and parallel artificial liquid membrane extraction (PALME) were optimized for the analysis of representative aromatic amines, as alternatives to liquid-liquid extraction (LLE). Relevant extraction parameters, namely organic solvent, extraction time, agitation speed, and acceptor solution pH, were studied, and the two optimized techniques-HF-LPME: dihexyl ether, 45 min, 250 rpm, and pH 1; PALME: undecane, 20 min, 250 rpm and pH 1-were compared. Comparison of the optimized methods showed that significantly higher recoveries could be obtained with PALME than with HF-LPME. Therefore, PALME was further validated. The results were successful for nine different AA, with regression coefficients (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.