Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36820899›Full record

ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2023

Unraveling disparate roles of organisms, from plants to bacteria, and viruses on built cultural heritage.

Patricia Sanmartín, Pilar Bosch-Roig, Domenico Pangallo, Lucia Kraková, Miguel Serrano

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Patricia SanmartínGEMAP (GI-1243), Departamento de Edafoloxía e Química Agrícola, Facultade de Farmacia, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. patricia.sanmartin@usc.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5733-8833
Pilar Bosch-RoigInstituto Universitario de Restauración del Patrimonio, Dpto. Conservación y Restauración del Patrimonio, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2019-399X
Domenico PangalloInstitute of Molecular Biology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 21, 845 51, Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9115-9409
Lucia KrakováInstitute of Molecular Biology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 21, 845 51, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Miguel SerranoDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. miguel.serrano@usc.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3079-2355
Slovak Academy of Sciences · SKUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESUniversitat Politècnica de València · ES

Funding

Consellería de Cultura, Educación e Ordenación Universitaria, Xunta de Galicia ED431B 2021/11Consellería de Cultura, Educación e Ordenación Universitaria, Xunta de Galicia ED431C 2022/09Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2021-123329NA-I00Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación RYC2020-029987-I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The different organisms, ranging from plants to bacteria, and viruses that dwell on built cultural heritage can be passive or active participants in conservation processes. For the active participants, particular attention is generally given to organisms that play a positive role in bioprotection, bioprecipitation, bioconsolidation, bioremediation, biocleaning, and biological control and to those involved in providing ecosystem services, such as reducing temperature, pollution, and noise in urban areas. The organisms can also evolve or mutate in response to changes, becoming tolerant and resistant to biocidal treatments or acquiring certain capacities, such as water repellency or resistance to ultraviolet radiation. Our understanding of the capacities and roles of these active organisms is constantly evolving as bioprotection/biodeterioration, and biotreatment studies are conducted and new techniques for characterizing species are developed. This brief review article aims to shed light on interesting research that has been abandoned as well as on recent (some ongoing) studies opening up new scopes of research involving a wide variety of organisms and viruses, which are likely to receive more attention in the coming years. KEY POINTS: • Organisms and viruses can be active or passive players in heritage conservation • Biotreatment and ecosystem service studies involving organisms and viruses are shown • Green deal, health, ecosystem services, and global change may shape future research.

Indexed as

EcosystemVirusesBacteriaHumansPlantsUltraviolet RaysBiocontrol agents (BCAs)BiotreatmentEcological factorsSpecies adaptationSpecies role in ecosystemsStone-built heritage

Identifiers

PMID36820899
PMCPMC9947938
OpenAlexW4321598562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.