ArticleHeart and vessels2023
Stenting of branch pulmonary artery stenosis in children: initial experience and mid-term follow-up of the pul-stent.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interventional Strategies for Pulmonary Artery Stenosis After the Arterial Switch Operation.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Main branches pulmonary artery stenting in congenital heart diseases: a case series.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Long-Term and Multidisciplinary Treatment of Tetralogy of Fallot in Pediatrics.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Selective iliofemoral stent placement for complex pediatric cases: a decade of institutional experience.Pediatric radiology · 2024Article
- Early and midterm results of Cook Formula stent in children with right heart disease: A single-center experience.Annals of pediatric cardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Not all stents are suitable for children. For instance, premounted stents can be used in infants and small children but cannot dilate with age to accommodate adult-sized pulmonary arteries. Conversely, the Pul-Stent adapts to somatic growth. Thus, our hospital implemented the Pul-Stent in pediatric patients with branch pulmonary artery stenosis. This study summarizes our initial experience with Pul-Stents in this patient population, including the efficacy and safety. We implanted 37 Pul-Stents in 35 patients between August 2014 and June 2015. The patients' mean age and weight at stent implantation were 6.7 ± 3.0 years and 20.9 ± 8.7 kg, respectively. Bench testing revealed that axial shortening of the Pul-Stent was minimal with further dilation, and the radial strength did not change. The stents were successfully deployed in all cases, except two with minor malpositioning. Primarily, 8-12 mm mounting balloons were used for the initial implantation, and a long sheath (8-10 F) was used for delivery. After stent implantation, the minimal lumen diameter in the stenosed segment increased by 50% in 97% (34/35) of patients. Furthermore, the pressure gradient across the stenosed segment decreased by 50% in 77% (23/30) of biventricular patients. One stent fracture and one stent restenosis were noted during the follow-up visits (mean follow-up time: 4.6 ± 1.7 years). Eighteen patients (51%) underwent repeat catheterization; ten had successful redilation. No aneurysms or stent fractures were observed. Our initial results indicate that the Pul-Stent is safe and effective in pediatric patients and can be further dilated over time to accommodate somatic growth. Moreover, the Pul-Stent has good compliance and adequate radial strength to treat pulmonary artery stenosis effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.