Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36820862›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2023

Litigation Cases After Post-Bariatric Surgery: Lesson from the Past.

Federico Facchin, Andrea Pagani, Filippo Andrea Giovanni Perozzo, Carlotta Scarpa, Franco Bassetto, Vincenzo Vindigni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Federico FacchinPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy. federicofacchin@yahoo.it.ORCID 0000-0002-6695-1103
Andrea PaganiClinic and Polyclinic of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Filippo Andrea Giovanni PerozzoPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Carlotta ScarpaPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Franco BassettoPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Vincenzo VindigniPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the high demand of post-bariatric surgeries, the number of litigation cases is rapidly growing. Even if surgical mistakes still represent one of the main causes of medico-legal issues, many disputes depend on what happens in the post-operative course. In this article we analyzed the litigation cases that occurred in our Plastic Surgery Department, the current literature about medico-legal disputes and the importance of the doctor-patient relationship. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe medical records of 788 post-bariatric surgeries, the post-operative complications and the related litigation cases from January 2015 to December 2019 were collected, analyzed and compared.

resultsWe performed 380 abdominoplasties, 28 torsoplasties, 65 breast reductions, 99 mastopexies, 94 brachioplasties, 52 thighplasties, 65 liposuctions and 5 facelifts between 2015 and 2019. Eight patients complained of medical issues and claimed for litigation. Despite in all cases the judges highlighted the risk of consent misinterpretation, the payout was granted only in one case.

conclusionPost-bariatric patients often mistake their preoperative condition and consider body contouring procedures as an aesthetic surgery treatment. Patients should be therefore clearly informed about the complexity of body contouring procedures after massive weight loss, which should never be compared to aesthetic surgery. Surgeons should always promote the communication with their patients and build a strong and trustworthy relationship. This attitude will allow to deal more easily with complications and, in the worst situations, with medico-legal litigations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

AbdominoplastyBariatric SurgeryBody ContouringLipectomySurgery, PlasticHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsBody contouring proceduresLegal litigationMassive weight lossMedico-legal issuesPost-bariatric surgeryPost-operative complications

Identifiers

PMID36820862
PMCPMC10784373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.