Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36820790›Full record

ArticleIEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference : healthcare technology : [proceedings]. IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference2022

Estimating Intrinsic Manifold Dimensionality to Classify Task-Related Information in Human and Non-Human Primate Data.

Zachary Bretton-Granatoor, Hannah Stealey, Samantha R Santacruz, Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference : healthcare technology : [proceedings]. IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 66% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zachary Bretton-GranatoorInstitute for Neuroscience The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX, USA.
Hannah StealeyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX, USA.
Samantha R SantacruzDepartment of Biomedical Engineering The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX, USA.
Jarrod A Lewis-PeacockDepartment of Psychology The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX, USA.
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Training in Learning and MemoryT32MH106454 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI PRESTON, ALISON R · 2015 to 2025
$2.1M
Biasing the Forgetting of Visual MemoriesR01EY028746 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI LEWIS-PEACOCK, JARROD A · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028746NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH106454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feature selection, or dimensionality reduction, has become a standard step in reducing large-scale neural datasets into usable signals for brain-machine interface and neurofeedback decoders. Current techniques in fMRI data reduce the number of voxels (features) by performing statistics on individual voxels or using traditional techniques that utilize linear combinations of features (e.g., principal component analysis (PCA)). However, these methods often do not account for the cross-correlations found across voxels and do not sufficiently reduce the feature space to support efficient real-time feedback. To overcome these limitations, we propose using factor analysis on fMRI data. This technique has become increasingly popular for extracting a minimal number of latent features to explain high-dimensional data in non-human primates (NHPs). Here, we demonstrate these methods in both NHP and human data. In NHP subjects (n=2), we reduced the number of features to an average of 26.86% and 14.86% of the total feature space to build our multinomial classifier. In one NHP subject, the average accuracy of classifying eight target locations over 64 sessions was 62.43% (+/-6.19%) compared to a PCA-based classifier with 60.26% (+/-6.02%). In healthy fMRI subjects, we reduced the feature space to an average of 0.33% of the initial space. Group average (n=5) accuracy of FA-based category classification was 74.33% (+/- 4.91%) compared to a PCA-based classifier with 68.42% (+/-4.79%). FA-based classifiers can maintain the performance fidelity observed with PCA-based decoders. Importantly, FA-based methods allow researchers to address specific hypotheses about how underlying neural activity relates to behavior.

Indexed as

classificationdimensionality reductionelectrophysiologyfactor analysisfeature selectionfMRInon-human primate

Identifiers

PMID36820790
PMCPMC9942267
OpenAlexW4309242576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.