Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36820784›Full record

ReviewJournal of applied oral science : revista FOB2023

An engineering perspective of ceramics applied in dental reconstructions.

Raíssa Monteiro Pereira, Renata Guimarães Ribas, Thaís Larissa do Amaral Montanheiro, Vanessa Modelski Schatkoski, Karla Faquine Rodrigues, Letícia Terumi Kito, Lucas Kazunori Kobo, Tiago Moreira Bastos Campos, Estevam Augusto Bonfante, Petra Christine Gierthmuehlen and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Recent advances in dental zirconia: 15 years of material and processing evolution.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Raíssa Monteiro PereiraInstituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica (ITA), Laboratório de Plasma e Processos (LPP), São José dos Campos, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6245-5105
Renata Guimarães RibasInstituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica (ITA), Laboratório de Plasma e Processos (LPP), São José dos Campos, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4972-6219
Thaís Larissa do Amaral MontanheiroInstituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica (ITA), Laboratório de Plasma e Processos (LPP), São José dos Campos, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4230-8161
Vanessa Modelski SchatkoskiInstituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica (ITA), Laboratório de Plasma e Processos (LPP), São José dos Campos, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4107-9849
Karla Faquine RodriguesInstituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica (ITA), Laboratório de Plasma e Processos (LPP), São José dos Campos, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6211-3911
Letícia Terumi KitoInstituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica (ITA), Laboratório de Plasma e Processos (LPP), São José dos Campos, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6576-7382
Lucas Kazunori KoboInstituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica (ITA), Laboratório de Plasma e Processos (LPP), São José dos Campos, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3229-1757
Tiago Moreira Bastos CamposInstituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica (ITA), Laboratório de Plasma e Processos (LPP), São José dos Campos, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8486-2510
Estevam Augusto BonfanteUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Departamento de Prótese e Periodontia, Bauru, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6867-8350
Petra Christine GierthmuehlenHeinrich-Heine-University, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Department of Prosthodontics, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4837-2546
Frank Akito SpitznagelHeinrich-Heine-University, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Department of Prosthodontics, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5535-2108
Gilmar Patrocínio ThimInstituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica (ITA), Laboratório de Plasma e Processos (LPP), São José dos Campos, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6410-3031

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The demands for dental materials continue to grow, driven by the desire to reach a better performance than currently achieved by the available materials. In the dental restorative ceramic field, the structures evolved from the metal-ceramic systems to highly translucent multilayered zirconia, aiming not only for tailored mechanical properties but also for the aesthetics to mimic natural teeth. Ceramics are widely used in prosthetic dentistry due to their attractive clinical properties, including high strength, biocompatibility, chemical stability, and a good combination of optical properties. Metal-ceramics type has always been the golden standard of dental reconstruction. However, this system lacks aesthetic aspects. For this reason, efforts are made to develop materials that met both the mechanical features necessary for the safe performance of the restoration as well as the aesthetic aspects, aiming for a beautiful smile. In this field, glass and high-strength core ceramics have been highly investigated for applications in dental restoration due to their excellent combination of mechanical properties and translucency. However, since these are recent materials when compared with the metal-ceramic system, many studies are still required to guarantee the quality and longevity of these systems. Therefore, a background on available dental materials properties is a starting point to provoke a discussion on the development of potential alternatives to rehabilitate lost hard and soft tissue structures with ceramic-based tooth and implant-supported reconstructions. This review aims to bring the most recent materials research of the two major categories of ceramic restorations: ceramic-metal system and all-ceramic restorations. The practical aspects are herein presented regarding the evolution and development of materials, technologies applications, strength, color, and aesthetics. A trend was observed to use high-strength core ceramics type due to their ability to be manufactured by CAD/CAM technology. In addition, the impacts of COVID-19 on the market of dental restorative ceramics are presented.

Indexed as

COVID-19Dental MaterialsCeramicsComputer-Aided DesignDental PorcelainHumansMaterials TestingSurface PropertiesZirconiumDental MaterialsDental PorcelainZirconium

Identifiers

PMID36820784
PMCPMC9972857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.