Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36820654›Full record

ArticleRevista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical2023

"It's not all about the disease": do treatment and socioeconomic status affect perceived impact and satisfaction of patients treated for cutaneous leishmaniasis?

Carolina Di Pietro Carvalho, João Gabriel Guimarães Luz, Amanda Gabriela de Carvalho, Renata Di Pietro Carvalho, Herton Helder Rocha Pires, João Victor Leite Dias

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carolina Di Pietro CarvalhoUniversidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Programa de Pós-graduação em Saúde, Sociedade e Ambiente, Diamantina, MG, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0262-5579
João Gabriel Guimarães LuzUniversidade Federal de Rondonópolis, Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Rondonópolis, MT, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0274-732X
Amanda Gabriela de CarvalhoUniversidade Federal de Rondonópolis, Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Rondonópolis, MT, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6358-2528
Renata Di Pietro CarvalhoUniversidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Programa de Pós-graduação em Saúde, Sociedade e Ambiente, Diamantina, MG, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5646-8185
Herton Helder Rocha PiresUniversidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Programa de Pós-graduação em Saúde, Sociedade e Ambiente, Diamantina, MG, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6335-3810
João Victor Leite DiasUniversidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Programa de Pós-graduação em Saúde, Sociedade e Ambiente, Diamantina, MG, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7367-3826
Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri · BRUniversidade Federal de Rondônia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis cross-sectional study compared the general impact of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) and patient satisfaction with treatment and health services as perceived by those undergoing different therapeutic regimens in an endemic region in South-Eastern Brazil. We also investigated the factors associated with both outcomes (general impact and satisfaction).

methodsWe included 84 patients with CL treated between 2018 and 2019 with intravenous meglumine antimoniate, liposomal amphotericin B, or intralesional meglumine antimoniate therapy. Data were collected through interviews that assessed sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidity status, access and use of health services for CL diagnosis and treatment, and the items of the Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Impact Questionnaire (CLIQ). The CLIQ is a psychometric questionnaire previously validated to assess the general impact of CL on patient satisfaction with treatment and health services. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the factors associated with high CL impact and low patient satisfaction.

resultsThe general impact of CL and patient satisfaction with treatment and health services were not significantly associated with the therapeutic regimen. High CL impact was associated with low family income (odds ratio [OR]:3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.0-10.3), occurrence of complications/adverse effects during treatment (OR:7.7; 95%CI:2.4-25.6), and additional costs during diagnosis and/or treatment (OR:12.1; 95% CI:2.8-52.4). Low satisfaction was associated with high disease impact (OR: 9.5; 95% CI:2.7-33.9), occurrence of complications/adverse effects (OR:4.2; 95% CI:1.3-13.0), and high family income (OR:7.1; 95%CI:1.7-28.2).

conclusionsOur data support public health policies aimed at reducing the impact of CL and its treatment as well as the use of therapy with fewer adverse effects.

Indexed as

Antiprotozoal AgentsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsLeishmaniasis, CutaneousOrganometallic CompoundsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMeglumineMeglumine AntimoniatePatient SatisfactionSocial ClassAntiprotozoal AgentsMeglumineMeglumine AntimoniateOrganometallic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID36820654
PMCPMC9957146
OpenAlexW4321380616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.