ReviewGlobal health action2023
Barriers and recommendations for colorectal cancer screening in Africa.
Review in Global health action, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Facilitators and barriers of lung cancer screening participation: umbrella and systematic review of the global evidence.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Global, regional, and national burden of early-onset and late-onset colorectal cancer, 1990-2021: a comparative analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.Future science OA · 2026Article
- Establishing cancer registries in Africa - focus on hepatopancreatobiliary cancers.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Review
- Assessing Adherence and Identifying Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Adult General Populations of Saudi Arabia: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Rising Incidence and Mortality of Colorectal Cancer in Young African Adults: Need for a Better Care Plan.Cureus · 2025Review
- Gastric Cancer at a Nigerian Tertiary Referral Center: Experiences With Establishing an Institutional Cancer Registry.Journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Gut microbiota and colorectal cancer: mechanistic insights, diagnostic advances, and microbiome-based therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Colorectal cancer: local results and significance in Hungary.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Colorectal cancer research priorities in Uganda: perspectives from local key experts and stakeholders.Future oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Utilization of colorectal cancer screening tests: a systematic review and time trend analysis of nationally representative data.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Review
- Barriers in early detection of colorectal cancer and exploring potential solutions.World journal of clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Roles of circRNAs in the progression of colorectal cancer: novel strategies for detection and therapy.Cancer gene therapy · 2024Review
- Utilizing an In-silico Approach to Pinpoint Potential Biomarkers for Enhanced Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer.Cancer informatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide. The incidence of CRC is rising in low- and middle-income countries but decreasing in high-income countries due to the widespread use of surveillance colonoscopy. In Africa, the implementation of screening programs remains a challenge, even in countries, such as Ghana that have established CRC screening guidelines.
objectiveThe purpose of this review was to identify the barriers and recommend strategies for implementing CRC screening in African countries.
methodsA literature search using PubMed was conducted with the following search terms: colorectal neoplasm, early detection of cancer, mass screening, colonoscopy, faecal occult blood test, faecal immunochemical test (FIT) and Africa. After inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, a total of 13 articles were reviewed.
resultsThe most common barriers reported were limited endoscopic capacity, poor knowledge of CRC and CRC screening, health care factors, cultural factors and sociodemographic factors. Recommendations to increase the availability of CRC screening tests were to include the use of FITs, to provide more training for health care providers, and to expand educational programs for patients, physicians, and religious/community leaders.
conclusionThe primary barrier to screening for CRC in Africa is the limited endoscopic capacity, specifically the lack of infrastructure and trained personnel, which requires systematic changes by governing bodies. In addition, health care professionals should be involved in educating patients about CRC and CRC screening. Further research is needed to clarify the factors related to subtypes of CRC and to explore the feasibility of using FITs in Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.