Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36820526›Full record

ArticleeLife2023

Neural population dynamics of computing with synaptic modulations.

Kyle Aitken, Stefan Mihalas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Structured flexibility in recurrent neural networks via neuromodulation.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2024
    Article
  4. Shaping dynamical neural computations using spatiotemporal constraints.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2024
    Review
  5. Structured flexibility in recurrent neural networks via neuromodulation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Simple synaptic modulations implement diverse novelty computations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kyle AitkenAllen Institute, MindScope Program, Seattle, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0207-5885
Stefan MihalasAllen Institute, MindScope Program, Seattle, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2629-7100

Funding

Modeling the structure-function relation in a reconstructed cortical tissueR01EB029813 · NIBIB · ALLEN INSTITUTE · PI ARKHIPOV, ANTON, MIHALAS, STEFAN · 2020 to 2020
$1.3M
From diverse dynamics to diverse computation via neural cell typesRF1DA055669 · NIDA · ALLEN INSTITUTE · PI MIHALAS, STEFAN, SHEA-BROWN, ERIC TODD · 2021 to 2021
$1.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029813NIDA NIH HHS RF1 DA055669NIH HHS F1DA055669NIH HHS R01EB02981NIH HHS R01EB029813NIH HHS RF1DA055669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to long-timescale rewiring, synapses in the brain are subject to significant modulation that occurs at faster timescales that endow the brain with additional means of processing information. Despite this, models of the brain like recurrent neural networks (RNNs) often have their weights frozen after training, relying on an internal state stored in neuronal activity to hold task-relevant information. In this work, we study the computational potential and resulting dynamics of a network that relies solely on synapse modulation during inference to process task-relevant information, the multi-plasticity network (MPN). Since the MPN has no recurrent connections, this allows us to study the computational capabilities and dynamical behavior contributed by synapses modulations alone. The generality of the MPN allows for our results to apply to synaptic modulation mechanisms ranging from short-term synaptic plasticity (STSP) to slower modulations such as spike-time dependent plasticity (STDP). We thoroughly examine the neural population dynamics of the MPN trained on integration-based tasks and compare it to known RNN dynamics, finding the two to have fundamentally different attractor structure. We find said differences in dynamics allow the MPN to outperform its RNN counterparts on several neuroscience-relevant tests. Training the MPN across a battery of neuroscience tasks, we find its computational capabilities in such settings is comparable to networks that compute with recurrent connections. Altogether, we believe this work demonstrates the computational possibilities of computing with synaptic modulations and highlights important motifs of these computations so that they can be identified in brain-like systems.

Indexed as

BrainNeuronal PlasticitySynapsesNeural Networks, Computerneural population dynamicsneurosciencenonerecurrent neural networkssynapse dynamicssynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID36820526
PMCPMC10072874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.