Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36820515›Full record

SynthesisSchizophrenia bulletin2023

Do People With Schizophrenia Enjoy Social Activities as Much as Everyone Else? A Meta-analysis of Consummatory Social Pleasure.

Danielle B Abel, Kevin L Rand, Michelle P Salyers, Evan J Myers, Jessica L Mickens, Kyle S Minor

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Motivation and Pleasure Deficits Undermine the Benefits of Social Affiliation in Psychosis.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cognitive Control in Schizophrenia: Advances in Computational Approaches.Current directions in psychological science · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Danielle B AbelDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0813-4655
Kevin L RandDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Michelle P SalyersDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7152-6454
Evan J MyersDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4058-0698
Jessica L MickensDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Kyle S MinorDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Management: Improving Submissions and Study Conduct in the Human Subjects Research Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002529 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOE, SHARON M, WIEHE, SARAH ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2022
$27.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe "emotion paradox" of schizophrenia suggests people with schizophrenia demonstrate deficits when reporting anticipated and retrospective pleasure; yet, in-the-moment, consummatory pleasure is largely intact. It is uncertain how these findings extend to social situations. This meta-analysis aimed to (1) determine the mean difference in consummatory social pleasure between people with schizophrenia and healthy controls, and (2) examine moderators of this effect, including study design and clinical characteristics of participants.

designA literature search using PsycINFO, Web of Science, Pubmed, and EMBASE databases was conducted. Studies measuring consummatory social pleasure using experience sampling methods and laboratory social simulations were included. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted using Hedge's g.

resultsMeta-analysis of 26 studies suggests people with schizophrenia exhibited a small, significant deficit in consummatory social pleasure (g = -0.38, 90% CI [-0.53, -0.22]). There was significant heterogeneity in effect sizes; magnitude was moderated by study design and type of measure used to assess social pleasure.

conclusionsOverall, people with schizophrenia seem to exhibit less consummatory social pleasure than controls. However, this deficit is smaller than in studies of anticipated and retrospective pleasure. Thus, consummatory social pleasure may not be quite as impaired in people with schizophrenia as traditional anhedonia research suggests. Moreover, pleasure deficits observed in people with schizophrenia may result from differences in the quality of their daily social experiences rather than differences in their capacity for social pleasure. Results have important implications for clinical interventions that address barriers to social engagement, low-pleasure beliefs, and cognitive remediation to treat schizophrenia.

Indexed as

SchizophreniaAnhedoniaHumansPleasureRetrospective StudiesSchizophrenic Psychologyemotion paradox of schizophreniaexperience sampling methodspsychotic disorderssocial anhedoniasocial functioning

Identifiers

PMID36820515
PMCPMC10154728
OpenAlexW4321611722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.