Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36820491›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2023

Comparison of two multimodal intramuscular anaesthetic protocols in uncooperative feline patients: effects on sedation and echocardiographic measurements.

Mara Bagardi, Chiara Locatelli, Paola G Brambilla, Sara Ghilardi, Vanessa Rabbogliatti, Martina Amari, Silvia Casiraghi, Giuliano Ravasio, Luigi Galimberti, Federica A Brioschi

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mara BagardiUniversity of Milan, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Lodi, Italy.
Chiara LocatelliUniversity of Milan, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Lodi, Italy.
Paola G BrambillaUniversity of Milan, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Lodi, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4255-555X
Sara GhilardiUniversity of Milan, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Lodi, Italy.
Vanessa RabbogliattiUniversity of Milan, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Lodi, Italy.
Martina AmariUniversity of Milan, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Lodi, Italy.
Silvia CasiraghiUniversity of Milan, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Lodi, Italy.
Giuliano RavasioUniversity of Milan, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Lodi, Italy.
Luigi GalimbertiHealth Protection Agency (ATS), Milan Metropolitan City, Lodi, Italy.
Federica A BrioschiUniversity of Milan, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Lodi, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5321-0410
University of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aims of this study were to compare the sedative effect, feasibility of venous angiocatheter placement and influence on heart rate (HR), systemic blood pressure (SBP) and echocardiographic variables of two multimodal anaesthetic protocols in uncooperative cats; and to compare their influence on HR, SBP and echocardiographic variables 20 mins after sedation and after elective ovariectomy.

methodsEighteen stray female cats randomly received intramuscular (IM) ketamine (2 mg/kg) and methadone (0.3 mg/kg) plus dexmedetomidine (7 µg/kg; group D, n = 9) or alfaxalone (2 mg/kg; group A, n = 9). A sedation score (0-15 [from none to good sedation]) was assigned at 5 mins, 10 mins, 15 mins and 20 mins after IM injection. Venous angiocatheter placement and echocardiographic examination feasibility scores (both from 0 to 3 [from very difficult to very easy]) were recorded at 20 mins. Echocardiography, HR and blood pressure measurements (Doppler and oscillometric methods) were performed at 20 mins and at the end of surgery.

resultsSedation and angiocatheter feasibility scores did not differ significantly between groups ( CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Both protocols allowed for effective sedation; however, cats in group D presented alterations in some echocardiographic measurements; the use of alfaxalone, combined with ketamine and methadone, is recommended to obtain a reliable echocardiographic evaluation in uncooperative cats.

Indexed as

AnestheticsAtrial FibrillationCat DiseasesDexmedetomidineKetamineAnimalsCatsEchocardiographyFemaleHypnotics and SedativesInjections, IntramuscularMethadoneRandom AllocationAnestheticsDexmedetomidineHypnotics and SedativesKetamineMethadoneEchocardiographymultimodal anesthesiasedationuncooperative cats

Identifiers

PMID36820491
PMCPMC10812084
OpenAlexW4321612274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.