Displaced medial clavicle fractures: a systematic review of outcomes after nonoperative and operative management.

Background: Fractures of the medial clavicle are uncommon. There is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment of displaced medial clavicle fractures. Methods: A systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was performed. PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were queried using the terms Results: The analysis included 15 studies (mean MINORS score, 10 ± 1.5) with a total of 135 patients (85% male, mean age 47 ± 10.9 years [range, 15-87 years]). Five studies (39 patients) reported outcomes following nonoperative treatment. At a mean follow-up of 27 months, there were 5 (13%) symptomatic nonunions, 2 (5%) malunions, and 2 (5%) delayed unions. Eleven studies (96 patients) reported outcomes following surgical treatment with a mean follow-up of 23 months. There were no reported nonunions. Complications included plate prominence/ irritation (30%) and additional surgery was performed for plate removal (27%), fixation failure (3%), and wound débridement (1%). Conclusion: There is limited, low-quality evidence in the literature to guide treatment of displaced medial clavicle fractures. The available data suggest that surgical treatment is associated with good functional outcomes and a lower risk of nonunion and malunion, compared to nonoperative treatment but plate irritation and further surgery to remove the plate was common.