ArticleJSES international2023
Reliability of the assessment of scapular posterior tilt angle using the smartphone and scapular movement during arm elevation in healthy individuals and patients with frozen shoulder: a cross-sectional study.
Article in JSES international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Frozen shoulders are associated with abnormal scapular movements. However, scapular posterior tilt movement in frozen shoulders has not been investigated using simple clinical methods. This study aimed to clarify the reliability of scapular posterior tilting movement using a smartphone and scapular posterior tilting movement in healthy individuals and patients with frozen shoulder. Methods: The participants were 22 healthy young (age 25.9 ± 4.1 years), 22 healthy middle-aged (age 52.6 ± 4.4 years), and 37 individuals with frozen shoulder (age 56.0 ± 7.0 years). Scapular posterior tilting movement was measured at shoulder flexion 0° (0° posterior tilt), shoulder flexion 90° (90° posterior tilt), and scapular tilt excursion using a smartphone. The intrarater reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (1, 3). Results: Intrarater reliability at 0° posterior tilt and 90° posterior tilt was 0.76 and 0.84, respectively. The 0° posterior tilt was not significantly different among the three groups ( Conclusion: Measurement of scapular posterior tilting movement using a smartphone was highly reliable. The frozen shoulder might compensate for the limited arm elevation of the glenohumeral joint by scapular posterior tilting movement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.