Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36820410›Full record

ArticleJSES international2023

Proximal humerus fracture sequelae: are corrective osteotomies still a taboo? The role of three-dimensional preoperative planning and patient-specific surgical guides for proximal humerus corrective osteotomy in combination with reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Andrea Cozzolino, Antonio Guastafierro, Alessio Bernasconi, Giuseppe Della Rotonda, Paolofrancesco Malfi, Alfonso Fedele, Marco Mortellaro, Paolo Minopoli, Livia Renata Pietroluongo, Raffaele Russo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [Fracture sequelae-when, how, what?]Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrea CozzolinoDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Antonio GuastafierroDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castelvolturno, Italy.
Alessio BernasconiDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe Della RotondaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castelvolturno, Italy.
Paolofrancesco MalfiDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Alfonso FedeleDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castelvolturno, Italy.
Marco MortellaroDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castelvolturno, Italy.
Paolo MinopoliDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castelvolturno, Italy.
Livia Renata PietroluongoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castelvolturno, Italy.
Raffaele RussoDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Symptomatic proximal humeral fracture sequelae (PHFS) represent a surgical challenge due to the altered bone and soft tissue morphology. The purpose of this study was to report the outcome of Multiplanar Corrective Humeral Osteotomies (MCHOs) in combination with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) performed following a three-dimensional (3D) preoperative planning and using a 3D-printed patient-specific surgical instrumentation (PSI) in type 1C, 1D, and 4 PHFS. Methods: In this prospective monocentric study, we enrolled patients affected by symptomatic PHFS type 1C, 1D, or 4 of Boileau's classification, treated between 2018 and 2019 with rTSA associated to MCHO and followed-up at 12 and 24 mo. The preoperative and postoperative Constant Score (CS), visual analog scale, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score were recorded. All patients underwent a preoperative computed tomography, then a dedicated software was used to run a segmentation algorithm on computed tomography images. Metaphyseal bone cuts were virtually performed before surgery in all patients, and a 3D-printed PSI was used to reproduce the planned osteotomies in vivo. Results: Twenty patients completed a 2-y follow-up. The mean (± standard deviation) CS, visual analog scale, and DASH values improve from 24.3 (± 8.8), 6.5 (± 1.3), 60.7 (± 9.6) preoperatively, to 67.7 (± 11.4), 1.6 (± 0.8), 24.1 (± 13.1) points after surgery, respectively. The minimally clinical important difference for CS and DASH score was achieved in 95% of patients. No major complication was observed. One patient showed an unexplained worsening of clinical scores between the 12 and the 24-mo follow-up, while in one patient bone resorption of the greater tuberosity was observed on radiographs at 2 y, with no clinical impact. Conclusion: The combination of preoperative 3D planning and intraoperative use of 3D-printed PSI to perform MCHO as concurrent procedure in the context of rTSA in the treatment of Boileau type 1C, 1D, and 4 PHFS may lead to a satisfactory clinical outcome at 2 y of follow-up.

Indexed as

3D printingFractures sequelaeHumerusMalunionPatient-specific instrumentationShoulder arthroplastyThree-dimensionalVirtual planning

Identifiers

PMID36820410
PMCPMC9937839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.