ArticleJSES international2023
Clinical and anatomical outcomes of isolated coracoclavicular fixation after acromioclavicular joint injury: is it stable enough or is additional horizontal fixation necessary?
Article in JSES international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multicenter evaluation of radiological and patient-reported outcomes following surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocations.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Article
- More Fixation, Better Outcome? Evaluating the Role of Additional Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction in AC Joint Injuries: A Multicenter Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recently, an emphasis has been put on anatomical reduction of acromioclavicular (AC) joint both in vertical and hortizontal planes for management of AC joint injuries due to persisting horizontal instability. Therefore, an additional AC fixation in horizontal plane has been recommended. However, relation between horizontal AC joint instability and clinical outcomes is still controversial. This study aims to evaluate outcomes of isolated coraco-clavicular fixation using arthroscopic assisted single coraco-clavicular tunnel technique in grade III and V AC joint injuries and to investigate the correlation between anatomical and clinical outcomes. Methods: This study was conducted with 19 patients with grade III or V AC joint injury. Clinical outcomes included postoperative pain intensity and functional outcomes (Constant Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and Subjective Shoulder Value). Radiological evaluations were performed using radiographs and postoperative computed tomography scans. Degree of initial injury and postoperative stability both on axial and coronal planes were evaluated after radiological assessment. Correlations between anatomical and clinical outcomes were investigated using Pearson's correlation test. Results: At the final follow-up assessment, the mean pain score was 1.8 ± 1.8, mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 81.0 ± 15.4, mean Subjective Shoulder Value was 81.3 ± 19.6, and mean Constant Score was 86.3 ± 14.8. The mean loosening ratio and AC distance were 43.5 ± 30.6% and 4.3 ± 12.4 mm, respectively. No correlation was observed between postoperative anatomical and clinical outcomes ( Conclusion: Additional AC fixation on horizontal plane is not a prerequisite for all injuries, there is no significant association between horizontal instability and clinical outcomes and indications of an additional AC fixation needs to be determined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.