Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36820378›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2023

E-cigarettes: A continuing public health challenge in India despite comprehensive bans.

Simone Pettigrew, Joseph Alvin Santos, Mia Miller, Thout Sudhir Raj, Min Jun, Georgia Morelli, Alexandra Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Tobacco harm reduction policy: The old wine in a new bottle.The Indian journal of medical research · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Simone PettigrewThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 1 King St, Newtown, 2042, Australia.
Joseph Alvin SantosThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 1 King St, Newtown, 2042, Australia.
Mia MillerThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 1 King St, Newtown, 2042, Australia.
Thout Sudhir RajThe George Institute for Global Health, New Delhi, India.
Min JunThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 1 King St, Newtown, 2042, Australia.
Georgia MorelliThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 1 King St, Newtown, 2042, Australia.
Alexandra JonesThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 1 King St, Newtown, 2042, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

India has introduced comprehensive e-cigarette bans focused on protecting youth from vaping-related harm. Despite these bans, educated young people appear to be a relatively high user group, although little is known about their usage patterns. The aims of the present study were to examine educated young adults' e-cigarette-related attitudes and behaviors and their support for various e-cigarette control policies. In total, 840 tertiary-educated young adults completed an online survey. Demographic characteristics, e-cigarette and tobacco use, beliefs about e-cigarettes, exposure to e-cigarette advertising, sources of access to e-cigarettes, numbers of family members and peers who vape, and support for a range of e-cigarette policies were assessed. One-third (33%) reported never having heard of e-cigarettes/vapes, 23% reported ever using e-cigarettes, 70% reported ever using tobacco, and 8% were dual users of both e-cigarettes and tobacco. Only 8% of e-cigarette users reported daily use. Vapers sourced e-cigarettes from retail outlets (vape shops, tobacconists) and their social networks (friends, siblings). Just under two-thirds of those who were aware of e-cigarettes believed them to be harmful and to contain chemicals. Among non-users, 31% were curious about using e-cigarettes and 23% intended to use in the following year, indicating high levels of susceptibility. The results suggest that despite a complete ban, young people are still able to access e-cigarettes in India. Greater education about harms associated with vaping and more intensive monitoring and enforcement could assist in reducing uptake in relatively high-prevalence groups such as educated young adults.

Indexed as

E-cigarettesIndiaPolicyTobaccoVaping

Identifiers

PMID36820378
PMCPMC9938321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.