ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2023
Development and Evaluation of a Novel Cuproptosis-Related lncRNA Signature for Gastric Cancer Prognosis.
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revealing the cuproptosis-lncRNA nexus in gastric cancer: A multicohort observational study.Medicine · 2026Observational
- The role of cuproptosis in the occurrence and development of gastric cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- lncRNAs as prognostic markers and therapeutic targets in cuproptosis-mediated cancer.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: According to a growing body of research, long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) participate in the progress of gastric cancer (GC). Cuproptosis is a distinct kind of programmed cell death, separating it from several other forms of programmed cell death that may be caused by genetic programming. Consequently, it is crucial to examine cuproptosis-related lncRNAs (CRLs) prognostic importance for the prognosis and treatment response in GC. Method: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database was used to retrieve RNA-seq data, pertinent clinical information, and somatic mutation data. A list of cuproptosis-related genes (CRGs) was obtained from prior work. We can distinguish prognostic CRLs using coexpression and univariate Cox analysis. Then, using CRLs, we developed a risk prediction model using multivariate Cox regression analysis and the least absolute shrinkage selection operator (LASSO) technique. To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of this model, a Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival analysis and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used. Moreover, the relationships between the risk model and immunological function, somatic mutation, and drug sensitivity were also investigated. Results: Using the multivariate Cox analysis technique, we developed a signature based on cuproptosis-related four lncRNAs. We then classified patients into high-risk and low-risk groups based on the likelihood of unfavorable outcomes. The model was subjected to further testing, including K-M survival analysis, ROC analysis, and multivariate Cox regression analysis, all of which proved the model's exceptional robustness and predictive capacity. In addition, a nomogram that has a strong capacity for prediction ability was built. This nomogram included age, gender, clinical grade, pathologic stage, T stage, and risk score. Furthermore, we discovered substantial disparities in immune function and the number of mutations carried by tumors between the high-risk and low-risk groups. Moreover, this research also found that the IC50 values for 27 chemotherapeutic drugs varied widely across patients within high- and low-risk groups. Conclusion: The proposed 4-CRLs signature is a promising biomarker to predict clinical outcomes in GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.