ArticleEcology and evolution2023
MaxEnt brings comparable results when the input data are being completed; Model parameterization of four species distribution models.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing Habitat Suitability and Exposure of the EndemicEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Predicting the Potential Distribution ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Distribution and Habitat Suitability ofEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Projected climate change impacts on habitat suitability of threatened medicinal plants in Himachal Pradesh, Western Himalaya: an ensemble species distribution modelling approach.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Climate-Driven Range Shift of the Medicinal HerbBiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Extensive Pollen Flow and Historical Population Expansions Shaped the Phylogeographic Pattern ofEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Climate change reshapes habitat suitability of ancient tea trees in Yunnan: insights from an optimized MaxEnt model.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Potential distribution, range dynamics, and livestock exposure risk ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Mechanisms of animal distribution: bridging advances in movement analysis with hierarchical and optimal foraging theories.Landscape ecology · 2026Article
- Article
- Predicting potential distributions of dominant species and assessing future afforestation risks in Guangdong limestone regions under climate change.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- The impact of climate change on plant diversity in peatlands in Sichuan province, China.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Optimized MaxEnt modeling predicts the distribution change ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Ecological niche and rickettsial risk mapping ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Modeling Climate Change Impacts on a Socioeconomically Vital Plant: The Case ofEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Predicting the impact of climate change on the habitat suitability and phytochemical quality of Salvia multicaulis Vahl.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Mapping heartwater risk in Guadeloupe using a combination of spatial modelling approaches.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Integrating MaxEnt and PLUS for Predictive Modeling of Mangrove Suitability and Land Use Impacts in Coastal Guangdong, China.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Environmental transmission from bamboo rats: Mapping current and future talaromycosis risk in China under climate change.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Species distribution models (SDMs) are practical tools to assess the habitat suitability of species with numerous applications in environmental management and conservation planning. The manipulation of the input data to deal with their spatial bias is one of the advantageous methods to enhance the performance of SDMs. However, the development of a model parameterization approach covering different SDMs to achieve well-performing models has rarely been implemented. We integrated input data manipulation and model tuning for four commonly-used SDMs: generalized linear model (GLM), gradient boosted model (GBM), random forest (RF), and maximum entropy (MaxEnt), and compared their predictive performance to model geographically imbalanced-biased data of a rare species complex of mountain vipers. Models were tuned up based on a range of model-specific parameters considering two background selection methods: random and background weighting schemes. The performance of the fine-tuned models was assessed based on recently identified localities of the species. The results indicated that although the fine-tuned version of all models shows great performance in predicting training data (AUC > 0.9 and TSS > 0.5), they produce different results in classifying out-of-bag data. The GBM and RF with higher sensitivity of training data showed more different performances. The GLM, despite having high predictive performance for test data, showed lower specificity. It was only the MaxEnt model that showed high predictive performance and comparable results for identifying test data in both random and background weighting procedures. Our results highlight that while GBM and RF are prone to overfitting training data and GLM over-predict nonsampled areas MaxEnt is capable of producing results that are both predictable (extrapolative) and complex (interpolative). We discuss the assumptions of each model and conclude that MaxEnt could be considered as a practical method to cope with imbalanced-biased data in species distribution modeling approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.