Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36820237›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2023

Assessing the impact of adaptations to the clinical workflow in radiotherapy using transit in vivo dosimetry.

Evy Bossuyt, Daan Nevens, Reinhilde Weytjens, Ahmed Taieb Mokaddem, Dirk Verellen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Evy BossuytIridium Netwerk, GZA Hospitals, Radiation Oncology Department, Antwerp, Belgium.
Daan NevensIridium Netwerk, GZA Hospitals, Radiation Oncology Department, Antwerp, Belgium.
Reinhilde WeytjensIridium Netwerk, GZA Hospitals, Radiation Oncology Department, Antwerp, Belgium.
Ahmed Taieb MokaddemIridium Netwerk, GZA Hospitals, Radiation Oncology Department, Antwerp, Belgium.
Dirk VerellenIridium Netwerk, GZA Hospitals, Radiation Oncology Department, Antwerp, Belgium.
Iridium Kankernetwerk · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Currently in-vivo dosimetry (IVD) is primarily used to identify individual patient errors in radiotherapy. This study investigated possible correlations of observed trends in transit IVD results, with adaptations to the clinical workflow, aiming to demonstrate the possibility of using the bulk data for continuous quality improvement. Materials and methods: In total 84,100 transit IVD measurements were analyzed of all patients treated between 2018 and 2022, divided into four yearly periods. Failed measurements (FM) were divided per pathology and into four categories of causes of failure: technical, planning and positioning problems, and anatomic changes. Results: The number of FM due to patient related problems gradually decreased from 9.5% to 6.6%, 6.1% and 5.6% over the study period. FM attributed to positioning problems decreased from 10.0% to 4.9% in boost breast cancer patients after introduction of extra imaging, from 9.1% to 3.9% in Head&Neck patients following education of radiation therapists on positioning of patients' shoulders, from 6.1% to 2.8% in breast cancer patients after introduction of ultrahypofractionated breast radiotherapy with daily online pre-treatment imaging and from 11.2% to 4.3% in extremities following introduction of immobilization with calculated couch parameters and a Surface Guided Radiation Therapy solution. FM related to anatomic changes decreased from 10.2% to 4.0% in rectum patients and from 6.7% to 3.3% in prostate patients following more patient education from dieticians. Conclusions: Our study suggests that IVD can be a powerful tool to assess the impact of adaptations to the clinical workflow and its use for continuous quality improvement.

Indexed as

Continuous quality improvementEPID, Electronic Portal Imaging DeviceFM, Failed MeasurementsH&N, Head&NeckHU, Hounsfield UnitsIn vivoIVD, In-vivo DosimetryPerfractionPSQA, Patient Specific Quality AssuranceTransit dosimetryVMAT, Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy

Identifiers

PMID36820237
PMCPMC9937948
OpenAlexW4320012082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.