Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36820234›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2023

CaraNet: context axial reverse attention network for segmentation of small medical objects.

Ange Lou, Shuyue Guan, Murray Loew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. ColonNeXt: Fully Convolutional Attention for Polyp Segmentation.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ange LouVanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Shuyue GuanThe George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3779-9368
Murray LoewThe George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1255-9341

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Segmenting medical images accurately and reliably is important for disease diagnosis and treatment. It is a challenging task because of the wide variety of objects' sizes, shapes, and scanning modalities. Recently, many convolutional neural networks have been designed for segmentation tasks and have achieved great success. Few studies, however, have fully considered the sizes of objects; thus, most demonstrate poor performance for small object segmentation. This can have a significant impact on the early detection of diseases. Approach: We propose a context axial reverse attention network (CaraNet) to improve the segmentation performance on small objects compared with several recent state-of-the-art models. CaraNet applies axial reserve attention and channel-wise feature pyramid modules to dig the feature information of small medical objects. We evaluate our model by six different measurement metrics. Results: We test our CaraNet on segmentation datasets for brain tumor (BraTS 2018) and polyp (Kvasir-SEG, CVC-ColonDB, CVC-ClinicDB, CVC-300, and ETIS-LaribPolypDB). Our CaraNet achieves the top-rank mean Dice segmentation accuracy, and results show a distinct advantage of CaraNet in the segmentation of small medical objects. Conclusions: We proposed CaraNet to segment small medical objects and outperform state-of-the-art methods.

Indexed as

attentionbrain tumorcolonoscopycontext axial reversesmall object segmentation

Identifiers

PMID36820234
PMCPMC9938296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.